QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online October 21, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 4147-4155 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01239

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wang, Z. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, Z. J.

The role of drag in insect hovering

Z. Jane Wang

Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

e-mail: jane.wang{at}cornell.edu

Accepted 11 August 2004

Studies of insect flight have focused on aerodynamic lift, both in quasi-steady and unsteady regimes. This is partly influenced by the choice of hovering motions along a horizontal stroke plane, where aerodynamic drag makes no contribution to the vertical force. In contrast, some of the best hoverers – dragonflies and hoverflies – employ inclined stroke planes, where the drag in the down- and upstrokes does not cancel each other. Here, computation of an idealized dragonfly wing motion shows that a dragonfly uses drag to support about three quarters of its weight. This can explain an anomalous factor of four in previous estimates of dragonfly lift coefficients, where drag was assumed to be small.

To investigate force generation and energy cost of hovering flight using different combination of lift and drag, I study a family of wing motion parameterized by the inclined angle of the stroke plane. The lift-to-drag ratio is no longer a measure of efficiency, except in the case of horizontal stroke plane. In addition, because the flow is highly stalled, lift and drag are of comparable magnitude, and the aerodynamic efficiency is roughly the same up to an inclined angle about 60°, which curiously agrees with the angle observed in dragonfly flight.

Finally, the lessons from this special family of wing motion suggests a strategy for improving efficiency of normal hovering, and a unifying view of different wing motions employed by insects.

Key words: lift, drag, efficiency, dragonfly flight, normal hovering, unsteady aerodynamics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Lu and G. X. Shen Three-dimensional flow structures and evolution of the leading-edge vortices on a flapping wing J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1221 - 1230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. J. Wang Aerodynamic efficiency of flapping flight: analysis of a two-stroke model J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 234 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. K. Wang and M. Sun A computational study of the aerodynamics and forewing-hindwing interaction of a model dragonfly in forward flight J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2005; 208(19): 3785 - 3804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]