QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online October 21, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 4105-4110 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01261

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Elias, D. O. Articles by Hoy, R. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Elias, D. O. Articles by Hoy, R. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The effect of substrate on the efficacy of seismic courtship signal transmission in the jumping spider Habronattus dossenus (Araneae: Salticidae)

Damian O. Elias^1,*, Andrew C. Mason² and Ronald R. Hoy¹

¹ Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Seeley G. Mudd Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
² Integrative Behaviour and Neuroscience, Department of Life Sciences, University of Toronto at Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ONT M16 1A4, Canada

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: doe2{at}cornell.edu)

Accepted 24 August 2004

The jumping spider Habronattus dossenus Griswold 1987 (Salticidae) communicates using seismic signals during courtship and can be found on rocks, sand and leaf litter. We examined the filtering properties of, and tested the efficacy of male courtship signals on, these natural substrates. These substrates have drastically different filtering properties at the distances at which the males court. Rocks sharply attenuated all frequencies, with considerable variability among different rocks. Desert sand showed band-pass properties, attenuating frequencies contained in the animal's signal. Leaf litter passed all frequencies and was the most favourable signalling environment. In behavioural trials, the proportion of males mating successfully was significantly higher on leaf litter than on rocks or desert sand. Males did not modify their courtship behaviour on different substrates. Therefore, the effectiveness of male courtship seismic signals appears to be strongly constrained by the available substratum resources.

Key words: vibration, jumping spider courtship, seismic communication, multimodal, signal design, signal evolution

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. A. Hebets Seismic signal dominance in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa stridulans Stratton 1991 Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1250 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. D. McNett and R. B. Cocroft Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers Behav. Ecol., February 24, 2008; (2008) arn017v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Fertin and J. Casas Orientation towards prey in antlions: efficient use of wave propagation in sand J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 210(19): 3337 - 3343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. O. Elias, N. Lee, E. A. Hebets, and A. C. Mason Seismic signal production in a wolf spider: parallel versus serial multi-component signals J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2006; 209(6): 1074 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Cokl, M. Zorovic, A. Zunic, and M. Virant-Doberlet Tuning of host plants with vibratory songs of Nezara viridula L (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2005; 208(8): 1481 - 1488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]