spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online December 10, 2003
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 263-268 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00740
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ames, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ames, C. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Top-down regression of the avian oviduct during late oviposition in a small passerine bird

T. D. Williams* and C. E. Ames

Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, Canada

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: tdwillia{at}sfu.ca)

Accepted 3 October 2003

Egg production in oviparous vertebrates is assumed to be costly but the physiological basis of any costs remains unknown. The avian oviduct is a highly differentiated linear organ, with five functionally specific regions. Here we show that the oviduct regresses rapidly `from the top down' as soon as the more proximal regions have completed their function but while the distal regions still retain an oviductal egg. In zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata, oviduct mass did not differ between early laying birds at the 1-egg stage compared with late-laying birds (with one remaining yolky follicle; dry mass, 151-167 mg). However, in birds with no remaining yolky follicles but with an oviductal egg, oviduct mass decreased to 94 mg (44%). Regression occurred unequally among different regions of the oviduct, with significant decreases in the proximal infundibulum/magnum and isthmus regions (59% and 40%, respectively), but no change in distal shell gland/vagina mass. The shell gland did not regress until after the last oviposition. Thus, the avian oviduct has a highly regulated size-function relationship consistent with a high maintenance energy cost for this organ. We suggest that oviduct function is a significant contributor to the physiological costs of egg production and might mediate individual variation in maternal effects associated with non-yolk components of egg quality (e.g. immunoglobulins, lysozyme).

Key words: cost of egg production, oviduct, organ size-function relationship, maternal effect, Taeniopygia guttata


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. Griggio, A. Devigili, H. Hoi, and A. Pilastro
Female ornamentation and directional male mate preference in the rock sparrow
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2009; 20(5): 1072 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M. E. Visser, L. J.M. Holleman, and S. P. Caro
Temperature has a causal effect on avian timing of reproduction
Proc R Soc B, June 22, 2009; 276(1665): 2323 - 2331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F. Vezina and T. D. Williams
The metabolic cost of egg production is repeatable
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2005; 208(13): 2533 - 2538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004