|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online July 26, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 3073-3088 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01138
When vortices stick: an aerodynamic transition in tiny insect flight
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, 251 Mercer Street, New York, NY 10012, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: millerl{at}cims.nyu.edu)
Accepted 10 June 2004
We have used computational fluid dynamics to study changes in lift generation and vortex dynamics for Reynolds numbers (Re) between 8 and 128. The immersed boundary method was used to model a two-dimensional wing through one stroke cycle. We calculated lift and drag coefficients as a function of time and related changes in lift to the shedding or attachment of the leading and trailing edge vortices.
We find that the fluid dynamics around the wing fall into two distinct
patterns. For Re
64, leading and trailing edge vortices are
alternately shed behind the wing, forming the von Karman vortex street. For
Re
32, the leading and trailing edge vortices remain attached to
the wing during each `half stroke'. In three-dimensional studies, large lift
forces are produced by `vortical asymmetry' when the leading edge vortex
remains attached to the wing for the duration of each half stroke and the
trailing edge vortex is shed. Our two-dimensional study suggests that this
asymmetry is lost for Re below some critical value (between 32 and
64), resulting in lower lift forces. We suggest that this transition in fluid
dynamics is significant for lift generation in tiny insects.
Key words: insect flight, Reynolds number, aerodynamics, computational fluid dynamics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Swartz, K. S. Breuer, and D. J. Willis Aeromechanics in aeroecology: flight biology in the aerosphere Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 85 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-O. Lehmann When wings touch wakes: understanding locomotor force control by wake wing interference in insect wings J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 224 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Aono, F. Liang, and H. Liu Near- and far-field aerodynamics in insect hovering flight: an integrated computational study J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 239 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Lentink, F. T. Muijres, F. J. Donker-Duyvis, and J. L. van Leeuwen Vortex-wake interactions of a flapping foil that models animal swimming and flight J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 267 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-O. Lehmann, S. P. Sane, and M. Dickinson The aerodynamic effects of wing-wing interaction in flapping insect wings J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2005; 208(16): 3075 - 3092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Alben and M. Shelley Coherent locomotion as an attracting state for a free flapping body PNAS, August 9, 2005; 102(32): 11163 - 11166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Miller and C. S. Peskin A computational fluid dynamics of `clap and fling' in the smallest insects J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2005; 208(2): 195 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Maybury and F.-O. Lehmann The fluid dynamics of flight control by kinematic phase lag variation between two robotic insect wings J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2004; 207(26): 4707 - 4726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||