spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 16, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 2691-2703 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01096
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Page, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Matheson, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Page, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Matheson, T.

Wing hair sensilla underlying aimed hindleg scratching of the locust

Keri L. Page* and Thomas Matheson

Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kp231{at}cam.ac.uk)

Accepted 17 May 2004

The anatomy and physiology of exteroceptors on the surfaces of the wings have been described in many insects, but their roles in behaviour have been less well studied. They have often been assumed to have a role primarily in flight. We show that the wings of the locust Schistocerca gregaria possess at least three different hair types with characteristic patterns of distribution that determine the probability of eliciting targeted hindleg scratching behaviour.

The different hair types are defined by their morphology and innervation. The shortest hairs (14–46 µm) are basiconic receptors containing both chemosensory and mechanosensory afferents. They are distributed widely across the dorsal surfaces of the forewings; some are located on the ventral surfaces of the hindwings, but none are found on the ventral surfaces of the forewings or the dorsal surfaces of the hindwings. Medium length hairs (73–159 µm) are found on all wing surfaces, but are restricted to the veins, principally the subcosta on the dorsal surface of the forewings. The longest hairs (316–511 µm) are found only on the postcubitus vein on the dorsal surfaces of the forewings, so that they form a pair of dorsal rows when the wings are folded at rest.

Touching the dorsal surface of a forewing can elicit aimed scratching movements of a hindleg, and we show that the probability of eliciting a scratch differs for different stimulus sites and for different start positions of the hind leg. The effectiveness of different stimulus sites can be correlated with the distribution of tactile hairs on the dorsal forewing surface. Touching the long hairs provides the strongest drive to elicit a scratch, and ablating them reduces the probability to almost zero. We conclude that input from forewing tactile hairs plays an important role in eliciting hindleg scratching and encodes the spatial location required for targeting.

Key words: Schistocerca gregaria, wing, tactile hair, basiconic sensillum, scratching




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. L. Page, J. Zakotnik, V. Durr, and T. Matheson
Motor Control of Aimed Limb Movements in an Insect
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 484 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004