spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 7, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 2417-2431 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01040
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hallemans, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Clercq, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hallemans, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Clercq, D.

Mechanical energy in toddler gait A trade-off between economy and stability?

Ann Hallemans1,2,*, Peter Aerts1, Bert Otten3, Peter P. De Deyn4 and Dirk De Clercq2

1 Laboratory for Functional Morphology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
2 Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
3 Institute of Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
4 Hoger Instituut voor Kinesitherapie en Ergotherapie, Antwerp, Belgium

* Author for correspondence at address 1 (ann.hallemans{at}ua.ac.be)

Accepted 21 April 2004

Mechanical energy expenditure was investigated in children who are just learning to walk and compared with adult mechanical energy expenditure during walking. First, we determined whether the inverted pendulum (IP) mechanism of energy exchange was present in toddlers. It seems that new walkers partially make use of this energy saving mechanism, but it is less efficient than in adults. The reduced recovery values (R=40% at optimal speeds in toddlers compared to 70% in adults) can be explained by their low self-selected walking speed in combination with their tossing gait (large vertical oscillations of the body) and by the observation that during as much as 25–50% of the gait cycle kinetic and potential energy are oscillating in-phase.

The second step was to calculate positive external mechanical work (Wext). Since the IP mechanism is less efficient in toddlers, more mass-specific positive work has to be performed to lift and accelerate the centre of mass than in adults walking at the same speed, even when differences in body size are taken into account.

The amount of positive internal work (Wint,k) necessary to move the body segments relative to the centre of mass was the third parameter we calculated. In toddlers Wint,k is largely determined by the kinetic energy of the lower limb. Compared to adults, toddlers have to perform less mass-specific work per unit distance to accelerate the body segments since the upper body is kept relatively stiff during walking and there is no arm swing.

Apart from work performed on the centre of mass and work performed to move the body segments relative to the centre of mass, when walking some work is also performed during double contact as both legs are pushing against each other. Two methods were used to calculate this amount of work, both leading to the same conclusions. Mass-specific work during double contact is small in toddlers compared to adults because of their low walking speed.

Finally the total amount of mechanical work performed in toddlers was compared to the work production observed in adults. Wext seems to be the major determinant for total mechanical energy expenditure. At intermediate froude numbers work production is comparable between adults and toddlers, but at low and high froude numbers Wtot increases due to the steep increases in Wext. Despite the fact that mechanical work requirements in toddler gait are underestimated if work during double contact is not taken into account, it is not a major determinant of the energy cost of walking.

Key words: toddler, gait, energetics, inverted pendulum, stability




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. E. Vereecke, K. D'Aout, and P. Aerts
The dynamics of hylobatid bipedalism: evidence for an energy-saving mechanism?
J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 209(15): 2829 - 2838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
Y. P. Ivanenko, N. Dominici, G. Cappellini, B. Dan, G. Cheron, and F. Lacquaniti
Development of pendulum mechanism and kinematic coordination from the first unsupported steps in toddlers
J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2004; 207(21): 3797 - 3810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004