spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 24, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 2221-2227 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01026
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hildner, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Soulé, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hildner, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Soulé, M. E.

Relationship between the energetic cost of burrowing and genetic variability among populations of the pocket gopher, T. bottae: does physiological fitness correlate with genetic variability?

K. Kelly Hildner1,* and Michael E. Soulé2

1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
2 Environmental Studies UCSC, PO Box Hotchkiss, CO 81419, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kelly.hildner{at}noaa.gov)

Accepted 14 April 2004

Many studies have reported relationships between genetic variability and fitness characters in invertebrates, but there is a paucity of such studies in mammals. Here, we use a statistically powerful paired sampling design to test whether the metabolic cost of burrowing, an important physiological trait in the pocket gopher, Thomomys bottae, correlates with genetic variability. Three pairs of pocket gopher populations were used, with each pair selected from a different subspecies and comprising one high genetic variability and one low genetic variability population. Genetic variability was measured using average allozyme heterozygosity and two measures of DNA fingerprint band sharing. In addition, the cost of burrowing for individuals from each population was determined from the oxygen consumption per gram of body mass per unit of work performed. Our results indicate that the cost of burrowing was significantly higher in populations with lower genetic variability (3-way ANCOVA, P=0.0150); mass-adjusted cost of burrowing in the low variability populations averaged 0.57±0.24 ml O2 g–1 kgm–1 and that in the high variability populations averaged 0.42±0.19 ml O2 g–1 kgm–1. The magnitude of the population differences in cost of burrowing was associated with the magnitude of difference in genetic variability. We conclude that population differences in genetic variability are reflected in physiological fitness differences for a trait that is essential to gopher survival.

Key words: metabolic efficiency, burrowing, genetic variability, fitness, inbreeding, genetic drift, Thomomys bottae






© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004