QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online May 24, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 2199-2208 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01008

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Göth, A. Articles by Evans, C. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Göth, A. Articles by Evans, C. S.

Social responses without early experience: Australian brush-turkey chicks use specific visual cues to aggregate with conspecifics

Ann Göth^* and Christopher S. Evans

Animal Behaviour Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: ann{at}galliform.bhs.mq.edu.au)

Accepted 1 April 2004

Almost all birds depend upon early experience with adults and siblings to learn recognition cues. Megapodes, such as the Australian brush-turkey (Alectura lathami), have evolved a very different life history. Eggs are incubated in mounds of decaying organic material. Chicks hatch asynchronously and receive no parental care, so imprinting cannot occur. Nevertheless, chicks subsequently form groups with similar-aged conspecifics. We explored the perceptual basis of this aggregation response, focussing on likely visual cues, such as pecking movements and body colour. Experiments were conducted under naturalistic conditions in a large aviary, using realistic robot models and colour filters. The robots successfully evoked a range of social responses resembling those of a live companion. Aggregation depended upon both behaviour and morphology. Simultaneous choice tests revealed that brush-turkey chicks preferred a pecking robot over either a static model or a scanning robot, suggesting that responsiveness depends upon particular movement patterns. In addition, chicks were sensitive to changes in appearance but only those that affected radiance at short wavelengths. The mechanism underlying social aggregation after hatching hence involves relatively specific cues. This perceptual bias seems to be largely experience independent and may exploit attributes to which potential predators are insensitive.

Key words: megapode, social aggregation, imprinting, species recognition, brood parasite, behavioural development

Related articles in JEB:

SIBLINGS SET THE SOCIAL SCENE

Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2004 207: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Van Dyk, A. J. Taylor, and C. S. Evans Assessment of repeated displays: a test of possible mechanisms J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 210(17): 3027 - 3035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Phillips SIBLINGS SET THE SOCIAL SCENE J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2004; 207(13): i - i. [Full Text] [PDF]