QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online May 13, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 2043-2054 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00990

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wood, C. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wood, C. M.

Dogmas and controversies in the handling of nitrogenous wastes: Is exogenous ammonia a growth stimulant in fish?

Chris M. Wood^*

Department of Biology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1

^* e-mail: woodcm{at}mcmaster.ca

Accepted 17 March 2004

Traditionally, waterborne ammonia is considered a toxicant that decreases productivity in aquaculture. However, several recent studies have suggested, but not proven, that growth of salmonids might actually be stimulated by chronic exposure to very low levels of ammonia. In the present study, two 70–71 day growth experiments were conducted under rigorously controlled experimental conditions with juvenile rainbow trout at total ammonia concentrations ([T_Amm])=0, 70 and 225 µmol l^–1, pH 7.6. In the first series, a small-scale laboratory proof-of-principle study at 15°C, there was a significant stimulation of mass gain, gross food conversion efficiency, condition factor and protein production per fish at [T_Amm]=70 µmol l^–1, without an increase in voluntary food consumption or change in `in-tank' O₂ consumption or ammonia excretion rates. These growth stimulatory effects were not seen at [T_Amm]=225 µmol l^–1, where the fish consumed more food, and excreted more ammonia, yet achieved the same mass and protein content as the controls. In the second series, a larger study conducted in an aquaculture facility at 6.5°C, growth rate, conversion efficiency and protein production per fish over 71 days were all significantly stimulated at [T_Amm]=225 µmol l^–1, but not at 70 µmol l^–1, without any change in voluntary food consumption. These effects occurred despite an early inhibition of growth at both [T_Amm] levels. When ration was restricted, growth was reduced and there were no longer any differential effects attributable to [T_Amm]. While the effective levels of [T_Amm] differed between the two series, in both, the P_NH3 level stimulating growth was 23 µtorr. The results are interpreted as reflecting either a stimulation of ammonia incorporation into amino acids and protein synthesis and/or a reduction in metabolic costs. The finding that low levels of exogenous ammonia can serve as a growth stimulant without altering food consumption may be important for aquacultural practice, and challenges traditional dogma that the effects of ammonia are detrimental to growth.

Key words: sublethal ammonia, salmonids, protein, specific growth rate, conversion efficiency

Related articles in JEB:

SPECIAL COLLECTION: DOGMAS AND CONTROVERSIES IN THE HANDLING OF NITROGENOUS WASTES

Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2004 207: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. A. Ortega, K. J. Renner, and N. J. Bernier Appetite-suppressing effects of ammonia exposure in rainbow trout associated with regional and temporal activation of brain monoaminergic and CRF systems J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2005; 208(10): 1855 - 1866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Phillips SPECIAL COLLECTION: DOGMAS AND CONTROVERSIES IN THE HANDLING OF NITROGENOUS WASTES J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2004; 207(12): i - i. [Full Text]