|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online April 8, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1689-1702 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00933
Wing inertia and whole-body acceleration: an analysis of instantaneous aerodynamic force production in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) flying across a range of speeds
Concord Field Station, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 100 Old Causeway Road, Bedford, MA 01730, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: thedrick{at}oeb.harvard.edu)
Accepted 12 February 2004
We used a combination of high-speed 3-D kinematics and three-axis accelerometer recordings obtained from cockatiels flying in a low-turbulence wind tunnel to characterize the instantaneous accelerations and, by extension, the net aerodynamic forces produced throughout the wingbeat cycle across a broad range of flight speeds (1–13 m s–1). Our goals were to investigate the variation in instantaneous aerodynamic force production during the wingbeat cycle of birds flying across a range of steady speeds, testing two predictions regarding aerodynamic force generation in upstroke and the commonly held assumption that all of the kinetic energy imparted to the wings of a bird in flapping flight is recovered as useful aerodynamic work. We found that cockatiels produce only a limited amount of lift during upstroke (14% of downstroke lift) at slower flight speeds (1–3 m s–1). Upstroke lift at intermediate flight speeds (7–11 m s–1) was moderate, averaging 39% of downstroke lift. Instantaneous aerodynamic forces were greatest near mid-downstroke. At the end of each half-stroke, during wing turnaround, aerodynamic forces were minimal, but inertial forces created by wing motion were large. However, we found that the inertial power requirements of downstroke (minimum of 0.29±0.10 W at 7 m s–1 and maximum of 0.56±0.13 W at 1 m s–1) were consistent with the assumption that nearly all wing kinetic energy in downstroke was applied to the production of aerodynamic forces and therefore should not be added separately to the overall power cost of flight. The inertial power requirements of upstroke (minimum of 0.16±0.04 W at 7 m s–1 and maximum of 0.35±0.11 W at 1 m s–1) cannot be recovered in a similar manner, but their magnitude was such that the power requirements for the upstroke musculature (minimum of 54±13 W kg–1 at 7 m s–1 and maximum of 122±35 W at 1 m s–1) fall within the established range for cockatiel flight muscle (<185 W kg–1).
Key words: cockatiel, Nymphicus hollandicus, flight, inertia, accelerometer
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. C. Johansson and A. Hedenstrom The vortex wake of blackcaps (Sylvia atricapilla L.) measured using high-speed digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2009; 212(20): 3365 - 3376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M Walker, A. L.R Thomas, and G. K Taylor Photogrammetric reconstruction of high-resolution surface topographies and deformable wing kinematics of tethered locusts and free-flying hoverflies J R Soc Interface, April 6, 2009; 6(33): 351 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. K. Riskin, J. W. Bahlman, T. Y. Hubel, J. M. Ratcliffe, T. H. Kunz, and S. M. Swartz Bats go head-under-heels: the biomechanics of landing on a ceiling J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2009; 212(7): 945 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Swartz, K. S. Breuer, and D. J. Willis Aeromechanics in aeroecology: flight biology in the aerosphere Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 85 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Byrnes, N. T.-L Lim, and A. J Spence Take-off and landing kinetics of a free-ranging gliding mammal, the Malayan colugo (Galeopterus variegatus) Proc R Soc B, May 7, 2008; 275(1638): 1007 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Fontaine, D. Lentink, S. Kranenbarg, U. K. Muller, J. L. van Leeuwen, A. H. Barr, and J. W. Burdick Automated visual tracking for studying the ontogeny of zebrafish swimming J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1305 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Berg and A. A. Biewener Kinematics and power requirements of ascending and descending flight in the pigeon (Columba livia) J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2008; 211(7): 1120 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Tobalske and A. A. Biewener Contractile properties of the pigeon supracoracoideus during different modes of flight J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 170 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. K. Taylor, M. Bacic, R. J. Bomphrey, A. C. Carruthers, J. Gillies, S. M. Walker, and A. L. R. Thomas New experimental approaches to the biology of flight control systems J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 258 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Tobalske Biomechanics of bird flight J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3135 - 3146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Tobalske, D. R. Warrick, C. J. Clark, D. R. Powers, T. L. Hedrick, G. A. Hyder, and A. A. Biewener Three-dimensional kinematics of hummingbird flight J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 210(13): 2368 - 2382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. L. Hedrick and A. A. Biewener Low speed maneuvering flight of the rose-breasted cockatoo (Eolophus roseicapillus). I. Kinematic and neuromuscular control of turning J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2007; 210(11): 1897 - 1911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. L. Hedrick, J. R. Usherwood, and A. A. Biewener Low speed maneuvering flight of the rose-breasted cockatoo (Eolophus roseicapillus). II. Inertial and aerodynamic reorientation J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2007; 210(11): 1912 - 1924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Tobalske and K. P. Dial Aerodynamics of wing-assisted incline running in birds J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2007; 210(10): 1742 - 1751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Gatesy and D. B. Baier The origin of the avian flight stroke: a kinematic and kinetic perspective Paleobiology, September 1, 2005; 31(3): 382 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Pfau, T. H. Witte, and A. M. Wilson A method for deriving displacement data during cyclical movement using an inertial sensor J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2005; 208(13): 2503 - 2514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Bishop Circulatory variables and the flight performance of birds J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2005; 208(9): 1695 - 1708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Soman, T. L. Hedrick, and A. A. Biewener Regional patterns of pectoralis fascicle strain in the pigeon Columba livia during level flight J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2005; 208(4): 771 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Usherwood, T. L. Hedrick, C. P. McGowan, and A. A. Biewener Dynamic pressure maps for wings and tails of pigeons in slow, flapping flight, and their energetic implications J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2005; 208(2): 355 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Phillips FLAPPING FORCES J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2004; 207(10): ii - ii. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
