|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online April 8, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1601-1606 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00908
Commentary |
Paradox lost: answers and questions about walking on water
Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950-3094, USA
e-mail: mwdenny{at}leland.stanford.edu
Accepted 2 February 2004
The mechanism by which surface tension allows water striders (members of the genus Gerris) to stand on the surface of a pond or stream is a classic example for introductory classes in animal mechanics. Until recently, however, the question of how these insects propelled themselves remained open. One plausible mechanismcreating momentum in the water via the production of capillary wavesled to a paradox: juvenile water striders move their limbs too slowly to produce waves, but nonetheless travel across the water's surface. Two recent papers demonstrate that both water striders and water-walking spiders circumvent this paradox by foregoing any reliance on waves to gain purchase on the water. Instead they use their legs as oars, and the capillary `dimple' formed by each leg acts as the oar's blade. The resulting hydrodynamic drag produces vortices in the water, and the motion of these vortices imparts the necessary fluid momentum. These studies pave the way for a more thorough understanding of the complex mechanics of walking on water, and an exploration of how this intriguing form of locomotion scales with the size of the organism.
Key words: Gerris, water strider, capillary wave, Denny's paradox, spider
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB: