spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 24, 2003
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 155-163 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00735
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higgs, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Popper, A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Higgs, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Popper, A. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Development of ultrasound detection in American shad (Alosa sapidissima)

D. M. Higgs1,3,*, D. T. T. Plachta2,3, A. K. Rollo1,3, M. Singheiser2, M. C. Hastings3,4 and A. N. Popper3

1 Department of Biology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4 Canada
2 Institut für Biologie II, RWTH Aachen, Germany
3 Department of Biology and Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
4 Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA 22217, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: dhiggs{at}uwindsor.ca)

Accepted 30 September 2003

It has recently been shown that a few fish species, including American shad (Alosa sapidissima; Clupeiformes), are able to detect sound up to 180 kHz, an ability not found in most other fishes. Initially, it was proposed that ultrasound detection in shad involves the auditory bullae, swim bladder extensions found in all members of the Clupeiformes. However, while all clupeiformes have bullae, not all can detect ultrasound. Thus, the bullae alone are not sufficient to explain ultrasound detection. In this study, we used a developmental approach to determine when ultrasound detection begins and how the ability to detect ultrasound changes with ontogeny in American shad. We then compared changes in auditory function with morphological development to identify structures that are potentially responsible for ultrasound detection. We found that the auditory bullae and all three auditory end organs are present well before fish show ultrasound detection behaviourally and we suggest that an additional specialization in the utricle (one of the auditory end organs) forms coincident with the onset of ultrasound detection. We further show that this utricular specialization is found in two clupeiform species that can detect ultrasound but not in two clupeiform species not capable of ultrasound detection. Thus, it appears that ultrasound-detecting clupeiformes have undergone structural modification of the utricle that allows detection of ultrasonic stimulation.

Key words: ultrasound detection, bullae, utricle, American shad, Alosa sapidissima


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Wilson, E. W. Montie, K. A. Mann, and D. A. Mann
Ultrasound detection in the Gulf menhaden requires gas-filled bullae and an intact lateral line
J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2009; 212(21): 3422 - 3427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
L. Remage-Healey, D. P. Nowacek, and A. H. Bass
Dolphin foraging sounds suppress calling and elevate stress hormone levels in a prey species, the Gulf toadfish
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2006; 209(22): 4444 - 4451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. A. Sisneros and A. H. Bass
Ontogenetic changes in the response properties of individual, primary auditory afferents in the vocal plainfin midshipman fish Porichthys notatus Girard
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2005; 208(16): 3121 - 3131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol LettHome page
D. A Mann, A. N Popper, and B. Wilson
Pacific herring hearing does not include ultrasound
Biol Lett, June 22, 2005; 1(2): 158 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. T. T. Plachta, J. Song, M. B. Halvorsen, and A. N. Popper
Neuronal Encoding of Ultrasonic Sound by a Fish
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2590 - 2597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
A. N. Popper, D. T.T. Plachta, D. A. Mann, and D. Higgs
Response of clupeid fish to ultrasound: a review
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2004; 61(7): 1057 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004