spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moon, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Urquhart, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moon, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Urquhart, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 1291-1297 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00253

Minimal shortening in a high-frequency muscle

Brad R. Moon1,*, Kevin E. Conley2, Stan L. Lindstedt3 and Michael R. Urquhart3

1 Department of Biology, PO Box 42451, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504-2451, USA
2 Department of Radiology, Box 357115, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
3 Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: BradMoon{at}louisiana.edu)

Accepted 21 January 2003

Reducing the cost of high-frequency muscle contractions can be accomplished by minimizing cross-bridge cycling or by recycling elastic strain energy. Energy saving by contractile minimization has very different implications for muscle strain and activation patterns than by elastic recoil. Minimal cross-bridge cycling will be reflected in minimal contractile strains and highly reduced force, work and power output, whereas elastic energy storage requires a period of active lengthening that increases mechanical output. In this study, we used sonomicrometry and electromyography to test the relative contributions of energy reduction and energy recycling strategies in the tailshaker muscles of western diamondback rattlesnakes (Crotalus atrox). We found that tailshaker muscle contractions produce a mean strain of 3%, which is among the lowest strains ever recorded in vertebrate muscle during movement. The relative shortening velocities (V/Vmax) of 0.2-0.3 were in the optimal range for maximum power generation, indicating that the low power output reported previously for tailshaker muscle is due mainly to contractile minimization rather than to suboptimal V/Vmax. In addition, the brief contractions (8-18 ms) had only limited periods of active lengthening (0.2-0.5 ms and 0.002-0.035%), indicating little potential for elastic energy storage and recoil. These features indicate that high-frequency muscles primarily reduce metabolic energy input rather than recycle mechanical energy output.

Key words: tailshaker muscle, rattlesnake, Crotalus atrox, muscle contraction, elastic recoil, cross-bridge, biomechanics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. P. H. Elemans, I. L. Y. Spierts, M. Hendriks, H. Schipper, U. K. Muller, and J. L. van Leeuwen
Syringeal muscles fit the trill in ring doves (Streptopelia risoria L.)
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2006; 209(5): 965 - 977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003