spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takada, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kasai, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takada, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kasai, M.
The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 1137-1142 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00231

Growth hormone is a weaker candidate than prolactin for the hormone responsible for the development of a larval-type feature in cultured bullfrog skin

Makoto Takada and Miyoko Kasai

Department of Physiology, Saitama Medical School, Moroyama, Iruma-gun, Saitama 3500495, Japan

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: makokam{at}saitama-med.ac.jp)

Accepted 13 January 2003

Prolactin (PRL) has, for some years, been considered to be the `juvenile hormone' in amphibians. Recently, growth hormone (GH) has been proposed as another candidate, because in the larval stages the expression of the mRNA GH is high but it is downregulated in the climax stages of metamorphosis or following treatment with thyroid hormone. In the present study, we investigated whether GH promotes the development of one particular larval-type feature of bullfrog tadpole skin in vitro. The amiloride-, acetylcholine- and ATP-stimulated short-circuit current (SCC) is a physiological marker of larval-type bullfrog skin. These types of ligand-stimulated SCC (1) developed when EDTA-treated tadpole skin was cultured with corticoids supplemented with PRL or GH and (2) were not significantly different between skin cultured with PRL and intact tadpole skin. However, the amiloride-induced SCC response in skin cultured with GH differed in its kinetics from that of the intact (control) tadpole. On this basis, PRL seems a better candidate than GH for the juvenile hormone, at least with regard to the development of amiloride-stimulated non-selective cation channels.

Key words: growth hormone, prolactin, amphibian metamorphosis, non-selective cation channel, bullfrog skin, Rana catesbeiana






© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003