|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Ontogeny of feeding function in the gray short-tailed opossum Monodelphis domestica: empirical support for the constrained model of jaw biomechanics
1 Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701,
USA
2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University College of Osteopathic
Medicine, Athens, OH 45701, USA
3 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati,
OH 45221, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: biknevic{at}ohio.edu)
Accepted 29 November 2002
The constrained model of masticatory function enables specific predictions of bite force potentials in skulls of differing craniodental configurations. In this study, empirical support for the constrained model is provided using maximum voluntary bite force data along Region I and II of the jaws of gray short-tailed opossums Monodelphis domestica. Then, growth series of M. domestica are used to assess how bite force potential changes with growth by evaluating craniodental changes using longitudinal sets of dorsoventral radiographs and by assessing maximal bite force potential at the Region I-II boundary of the jaw in juveniles (aged 70-80 days) and adults. Our findings show that, while juveniles and adults alike enclose at least three molariform teeth within Region II (the area of highest bite force potential along the jaw), age-dependent elongation of the masticatory muscle resultant lever arm and narrowing of the palate relative to jaw length especially enhance the mechanical advantage of the adductor muscle resultant in adults. While maximal bite forces at the Region I-II boundary are absolutely greater in adults, these bite forces scale isometrically with body mass, which suggests that mass-specific forces exerted by jaw adductor muscles of larger (adult) opossums are disproportionately smaller than those exerted by smaller (juvenile) opossums.
Key words: bite force, ontogeny, gray short-tailed opossum, Monodelphis domestica
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. E. Vincent, B. R. Moon, A. Herrel, and N. J. Kley Are ontogenetic shifts in diet linked to shifts in feeding mechanics? Scaling of the feeding apparatus in the banded watersnake Nerodia fasciata J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2007; 210(12): 2057 - 2069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Herring, S. C. Pedersen, and X. Huang Ontogeny of bone strain: the zygomatic arch in pigs J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2005; 208(23): 4509 - 4521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Huber, T. G. Eason, R. E. Hueter, and P. J. Motta Analysis of the bite force and mechanical design of the feeding mechanism of the durophagous horn shark Heterodontus francisci J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2005; 208(18): 3553 - 3571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Phillips BABY BITE J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2003; 206(5): 787 - 787. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||