QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online October 10, 2003

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Burton, B. G. Articles by Laughlin, S. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Burton, B. G. Articles by Laughlin, S. B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 3963-3977 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00600

Neural images of pursuit targets in the photoreceptor arrays of male and female houseflies Musca domestica

Brian G. Burton^* and Simon B. Laughlin

Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK

Author for correspondence (e-mail: s.laughlin{at}zoo.cam.ac.uk)

Accepted 11 July 2003

Male houseflies use a sex-specific frontal eye region, the lovespot, to detect and pursue mates. We recorded the electrical responses of photoreceptors to optical stimuli that simulate the signals received by a male or female photoreceptor as a conspecific passes through its field of view. We analysed the ability of male and female frontal photoreceptors to code conspecifics over the range of speeds and distances encountered during pursuit, and reconstructed the neural images of these targets in photoreceptor arrays. A male's lovespot photoreceptor detects a conspecific at twice the distance of a female photoreceptor, largely through better optics. This detection distance greatly exceeds those reported in previous behavioural studies. Lovespot photoreceptors respond more strongly than female photoreceptors to targets tracked during pursuit, with amplitudes reaching 25 mV. The male photoreceptor also has a faster response, exhibits a unique preference for stimuli of 20-30 ms duration that selects for conspecifics and deblurs moving images with response transients. White-noise analysis substantially underestimates these improvements. We conclude that in the lovespot, both optics and phototransduction are specialised to enhance and deblur the neural images of moving targets, and propose that analogous mechanisms may sharpen the neural image still further as it is transferred to visual interneurones.

Key words: photoreceptor, target, tracking, retina, coding, housefly

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JEB:

MALE HOUSEFLIES CLEARLY SEE BETTER

Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2003 206: 3888. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Boeddeker and M. Egelhaaf A single control system for smooth and saccade-like pursuit in blowflies J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2005; 208(8): 1563 - 1572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. G. Stavenga Visual acuity of fly photoreceptors in natural conditions - dependence on UV sensitizing pigment and light-controlling pupil J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2004; 207(10): 1703 - 1713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Phillips MALE HOUSEFLIES CLEARLY SEE BETTER J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2003; 206(22): 3888 - 3888. [Full Text] [PDF]