spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online October 10, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burton, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Laughlin, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burton, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Laughlin, S. B.
The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 3963-3977 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00600

Neural images of pursuit targets in the photoreceptor arrays of male and female houseflies Musca domestica

Brian G. Burton* and Simon B. Laughlin{dagger}

Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK

{dagger} Author for correspondence (e-mail: s.laughlin{at}zoo.cam.ac.uk)

Accepted 11 July 2003

Male houseflies use a sex-specific frontal eye region, the lovespot, to detect and pursue mates. We recorded the electrical responses of photoreceptors to optical stimuli that simulate the signals received by a male or female photoreceptor as a conspecific passes through its field of view. We analysed the ability of male and female frontal photoreceptors to code conspecifics over the range of speeds and distances encountered during pursuit, and reconstructed the neural images of these targets in photoreceptor arrays. A male's lovespot photoreceptor detects a conspecific at twice the distance of a female photoreceptor, largely through better optics. This detection distance greatly exceeds those reported in previous behavioural studies. Lovespot photoreceptors respond more strongly than female photoreceptors to targets tracked during pursuit, with amplitudes reaching 25 mV. The male photoreceptor also has a faster response, exhibits a unique preference for stimuli of 20-30 ms duration that selects for conspecifics and deblurs moving images with response transients. White-noise analysis substantially underestimates these improvements. We conclude that in the lovespot, both optics and phototransduction are specialised to enhance and deblur the neural images of moving targets, and propose that analogous mechanisms may sharpen the neural image still further as it is transferred to visual interneurones.

Key words: photoreceptor, target, tracking, retina, coding, housefly


Related articles in JEB:

MALE HOUSEFLIES CLEARLY SEE BETTER
Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2003 206: 3888. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
N. Boeddeker and M. Egelhaaf
A single control system for smooth and saccade-like pursuit in blowflies
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2005; 208(8): 1563 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. G. Stavenga
Visual acuity of fly photoreceptors in natural conditions - dependence on UV sensitizing pigment and light-controlling pupil
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2004; 207(10): 1703 - 1713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Phillips
MALE HOUSEFLIES CLEARLY SEE BETTER
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2003; 206(22): 3888 - 3888.
[Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003