spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online September 23, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Brochta, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Brochta, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, P. W.
The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 3823-3834 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00638


Review Article

Gene vector and transposable element behavior in mosquitoes

David A. O'Brochta1,*, Nagaraja Sethuraman1, Raymond Wilson2,{dagger}, Robert H. Hice3, Alexandra C. Pinkerton3,{ddagger}, Cynthia S. Levesque3, Dennis K. Bideshi3, Nijole Jasinskiene4, Craig J. Coates5, Anthony A. James4, Michael J. Lehane2 and Peter W. Atkinson3

1 Center for Biosystems Research, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, College Park, MD 20742-4450, USA,
2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK,
3 Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA,
4 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
5 Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2475, USA

* Author for correspondence (obrochta{at}umbi.umd.edu)

Accepted 18 July 2003

The development of efficient germ-line transformation technologies for mosquitoes has increased the ability of entomologists to find, isolate and analyze genes. The utility of the currently available systems will be determined by a number of factors including the behavior of the gene vectors during the initial integration event and their behavior after chromosomal integration. Post-integration behavior will determine whether the transposable elements being employed currently as primary gene vectors will be useful as gene-tagging and enhancer-trapping agents. The post-integration behavior of existing insect vectors has not been extensively examined. Mos1 is useful as a primary germ-line transformation vector in insects but is inefficiently remobilized in Drosophila melanogaster and Aedes aegypti. Hermes transforms D. melanogaster efficiently and can be remobilized in this species. This element is also useful for creating transgenic A. aegypti, but its mode of integration in mosquitoes results in the insertion of flanking plasmid DNA. Hermes can be remobilized in the soma of A. aegypti and transposes using a common cut-and-paste mechanism; however, the element does not remobilize in the germ line. piggyBac can be used to create transgenic mosquitoes and occasionally integrates using a mechanism other than a simple cut-and-paste mechanism. Preliminary data suggest that remobilization is infrequent. Minos also functions in mosquitoes and, like the other gene vectors, appears to remobilize inefficiently following integration. These results have implications for future gene vector development efforts and applications.

Key words: mosquito, transgenic insect, transposable element, Hermes, mariner, piggyBac, Minos


Related articles in JEB:

MALARIA IN EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2003 206: 3723-3726. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. K. Biedler, H. Shao, and Z. Tu
Evolution and Horizontal Transfer of a DD37E DNA Transposon in Mosquitoes
Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2553 - 2558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
K. J. Maragathavally, J. M. Kaminski, and C. J. Coates
Chimeric Mos1 and piggyBac transposases result in site-directed integration
FASEB J, September 1, 2006; 20(11): 1880 - 1882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Irvin, M. S. Hoddle, D. A. O'Brochta, B. Carey, and P. W. Atkinson
Assessing fitness costs for transgenic Aedes aegypti expressing the GFP marker and transposase genes
PNAS, January 20, 2004; 101(3): 891 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003