|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Auditory encoding during the last moment of a moth's life
1 Department of Biology, Erindale College (University of Toronto), 3359
Mississauga Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5L 1C6
2 Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South
Africa
Present address: Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing
Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jfullard{at}utm.utoronto.ca)
Accepted 17 October 2002
The simple auditory system of noctuoid moths has long been a model for anti-predator studies in neuroethology, although these ears have rarely been experimentally stimulated by the sounds they would encounter from naturally attacking bats. We exposed the ears of five noctuoid moth species to the pre-recorded echolocation calls of an attacking bat (Eptesicus fuscus) to observe the acoustic encoding of the receptors at this critical time in their defensive behaviour. The B cell is a non-tympanal receptor common to all moths that has been suggested to respond to sound, but we found no evidence of this and suggest that its acoustic responsiveness is an artifact arising from its proprioceptive function. The A1 cell, the most sensitive tympanal receptor in noctuid and arctiid moths and the only auditory receptor in notodontid moths, encodes the attack calls with a bursting firing pattern to a point approximately 150 ms from when the bat would have captured the moth. At this point, the firing of the A1 cell reduces to a non-bursting pattern with longer inter-spike periods, suggesting that the moth may no longer express the erratic flight used to escape very close bats. This may be simply due to the absence of selection pressure on moths for auditory tracking of bat echolocation calls beyond this point. Alternatively, the reduced firing may be due to the acoustic characteristics of attack calls in the terminal phase and an acoustic maneuver used by the bat to facilitate its capture of the moth. Although the role of less sensitive A2 cell remains uncertain in the evasive flight responses of moths it may act as a trigger in eliciting sound production, a close-range anti-bat behaviour in the tiger moth, Cycnia tenera.
Key words: attacking bat, Eptesicus fuscus, noctuoid moth, acoustic, predator, echolocation, auditory defence
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. S. Jacobs, J. M. Ratcliffe, and J. H. Fullard Beware of bats, beware of birds: the auditory responses of eared moths to bat and bird predation Behav. Ecol., July 22, 2008; (2008) arn071v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H. Fullard, J. M. Ratcliffe, and C. G. Christie Acoustic feature recognition in the dogbane tiger moth, Cycnia tenera J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2007; 210(14): 2481 - 2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Triblehorn and D. D. Yager Timing of praying mantis evasive responses during simulated bat attack sequences J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2005; 208(10): 1867 - 1876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Skals, P. Anderson, M. Kanneworff, C. Lofstedt, and A. Surlykke Her odours make him deaf: crossmodal modulation of olfaction and hearing in a male moth J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2005; 208(4): 595 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Phillips DEATHLY SILENCE IMPROVES A BAT'S CHANCE J. Exp. Biol., March 2, 2003; 206(2): 209 - 209. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
