spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Duren, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Videler, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Duren, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Videler, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 269-279 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00079

Escape from viscosity: the kinematics and hydrodynamics of copepod foraging and escape swimming

Luca A. van Duren* and John J. Videler

Department of Marine Biology, University of Groningen, PO Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, the Netherlands

* Author for correspondence at present address: NIOO-CEME/KNAW, PO Box 140, 4400 AC Yerseke, the Netherlands

Accepted 14 October 2002

Feeding and escape swimming in adult females of the calanoid copepod Temora longicornis Müller were investigated and compared. Swimming velocities were calculated using a 3-D filming setup. Foraging velocities ranged between 2 and 6 mm s-1, while maximum velocities of up to 80 mm s-1 were reached during escape responses. Foraging took place at Reynolds numbers between 2 and 6, indicating that viscous forces are considerable during this swimming mode. Inertial forces are much more important during escape responses, when Reynolds numbers of more than 100 are reached.

High-speed film recordings at 500 frames s-1 of the motion pattern of the feeding appendages and the escape movement of the swimming legs revealed that the two swimming modes are essentially very different. While foraging, the first three mouth appendages (antennae, mandibular palps and maxillules) create a backwards motion of water with a metachronal beating pattern. During escape movements the mouth appendages stop moving and the swimming legs beat in a very fast metachronal rhythm, accelerating a jet of water backwards. The large antennules are folded backwards, resulting in a streamlined body shape.

Particle image velocimetry analysis of the flow around foraging and escaping copepods revealed that during foraging an asymmetrical vortex system is created on the ventral side of the animal. The feeding motion is steady over a long period of time. The rate of energy dissipation due to viscous friction relates directly to the energetic cost of the feeding current. During escape responses a vortex ring appears behind the animal, which dissipates over time. Several seconds after cessation of swimming leg movements, energy dissipation can still be measured. During escape responses the rate of energy dissipation due to viscous friction increases by up to two orders of magnitude compared to the rate when foraging.

Key words: copepod, Temora longicornis, swimming, hydrodynamics, kinematics, escape response, feeding current, Reynolds number regime


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. L. Lim and M. E. DeMont
Kinematics, hydrodynamics and force production of pleopods suggest jet-assisted walking in the American lobster (Homarus americanus)
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2009; 212(17): 2731 - 2745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
I. K. Bartol, P. S. Krueger, W. J. Stewart, and J. T. Thompson
Pulsed jet dynamics of squid hatchlings at intermediate Reynolds numbers
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2009; 212(10): 1506 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. B. Catton, D. R. Webster, J. Brown, and J. Yen
Quantitative analysis of tethered and free-swimming copepodid flow fields
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2007; 210(2): 299 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
H. H. Jakobsen, E. Halvorsen, B. W. Hansen, and A. W. Visser
Effects of prey motility and concentration on feeding in Acartia tonsa and Temora longicornis: the importance of feeding modes
J. Plankton Res., August 1, 2005; 27(8): 775 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
L. S. Svetlichny and E. S. Hubareva
The energetics of Calanus euxinus: locomotion, filtration of food and specific dynamic action
J. Plankton Res., July 1, 2005; 27(7): 671 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003