QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online August 8, 2003

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Matheson, T. Articles by Dürr, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Matheson, T. Articles by Dürr, V.

The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 3175-3186 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00534

Load compensation in targeted limb movements of an insect

Tom Matheson^1,* and Volker Dürr²

¹ Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
² Abteilung für Biokybernetik und Theoretische Biologie, Fakultät für Biologie, Universität Bielefeld, Postfach 10 01 31, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: tm114{at}hermes.cam.ac.uk)

Accepted 12 June 2003

The task of a multi-jointed limb making an aimed movement towards a target requires that the movement is regulated against external perturbations such as changing load. In particular, loading one part of a limb leads to altered static forces on all proximal segments, and to additional dynamic joint interaction forces when the limb moves. We have addressed the question of load compensation in an insect preparation in which a locust makes aimed scratching movements with a hind leg in response to tactile stimulation of a wing.

We show that loading the femur or tibia with the equivalent of 8.5 times the mass of the tibia (corresponding to an increase of up to 11.6 times the rotational moment of inertia at the femur–tibia joint) does not impair the animal's ability to make well-coordinated, aimed movements of that leg towards different targets. The kinematics of the movements are the same, and animals aim the same part of their distal tibia at the target, regardless of loading. The movements are carried out with equal accuracy and at the same initial velocity under all load conditions. Because loading of the leg does not change the behavioural performance, there is no indication of a change in aiming strategy. This implies high leg joint stiffness and/or the existence of high gain proprioceptive control loops. We have previously shown that in the unloaded condition, movements elicited by stimuli to different places on the wing are driven by a single underlying movement pattern that shifts depending on stimulus location along the wing surface. Our present data show that leg proprioceptive inputs are also integrated into the leg motor networks, rendering hind limb targeting robust against large changes in moment of inertia.

Key words: reaching, load compensation, scratching, locust, Schistocerca gregaria, coordination, insect, motor control, sensory feedback

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. L. Page, J. Zakotnik, V. Durr, and T. Matheson Motor Control of Aimed Limb Movements in an Insect J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 484 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Zakotnik, T. Matheson, and V. Durr Co-contraction and passive forces facilitate load compensation of aimed limb movements. J. Neurosci., May 10, 2006; 26(19): 4995 - 5007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Belanger Contrasting Tactics in Motor Control by Vertebrates and Arthropods Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2005; 45(4): 672 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Durr and T. Matheson Graded Limb Targeting in an Insect Is Caused by the Shift of a Single Movement Pattern J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1754 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]