spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 8, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Altshuler, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Altshuler, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, R.
The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 3139-3147 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00540

Kinematics of hovering hummingbird flight along simulated and natural elevational gradients

Douglas L. Altshuler1,* and Robert Dudley1,2,{dagger}

1 Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
2 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, PO Box 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama

* Author for correspondence at present address: Bioengineering, Mail Code: 138-78, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA (e-mail: doug{at}caltech.edu)

Accepted 12 June 2003

Hovering flight is one of the most energetically demanding forms of animal locomotion. Despite the cost, hummingbirds regularly hover at high elevations, where flight is doubly challenging because of reduced air density and oxygen availability. We performed three laboratory experiments to examine how air density and oxygen partial pressure influence wingbeat kinematics. In the first study, we experimentally lowered air density but maintained constant oxygen partial pressure. Under these hypodense but normoxic conditions, hummingbirds increased stroke amplitude substantially and increased wingbeat frequency slightly. In the second experiment, we maintained constant air density but decreased oxygen partial pressure. Under these normodense but hypoxic conditions, hummingbirds did not alter stroke amplitude but instead reduced wingbeat frequency until they could no longer generate enough vertical force to offset body weight. In a final combined experiment, we decreased air density but increased oxygen availability, and found that the wingbeat kinematics were unaffected by supplemental oxygen.

We also studied hovering and maximally loaded flight performance for 43 hummingbird species distributed along a natural elevational gradient in Peru. During free hovering flight, hummingbirds showed increased stroke amplitude interspecifically at higher elevations, mirroring the intra-individual responses in our first laboratory experiment. During loaded flight, hummingbirds increased both wingbeat frequency and wing stroke amplitude by 19% relative to free-flight values at any given elevation. We conclude that modulation of wing stroke amplitude is a major compensatory mechanism for flight in hypodense or hypobaric environments. By contrast, increases in wingbeat frequency impose substantial metabolic demands, are only elicited transiently and anaerobically, and cannot be used to generate additional sustained lift at high elevations.

Key words: air density, elevation, flight, hummingbird, hyperoxia, hypoxia, kinematics, load lifting, oxygen concentration, wingbeat frequency, stroke amplitude


Related articles in JEB:

HOW HUMMINGBIRDS SCALE THE HEIGHTS
Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2003 206: 3115. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
T. H. Kunz, S. A. Gauthreaux Jr, N. I. Hristov, J. W. Horn, G. Jones, E. K. V. Kalko, R. P. Larkin, G. F. McCracken, S. M. Swartz, R. B. Srygley, et al.
Aeroecology: probing and modeling the aerosphere
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 1 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. W. Tobalske, D. R. Warrick, C. J. Clark, D. R. Powers, T. L. Hedrick, G. A. Hyder, and A. A. Biewener
Three-dimensional kinematics of hummingbird flight
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 210(13): 2368 - 2382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. C. Welch Jr, D. L. Altshuler, and R. K. Suarez
Oxygen consumption rates in hovering hummingbirds reflect substrate-dependent differences in P/O ratios: carbohydrate as a `premium fuel'
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2007; 210(12): 2146 - 2153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. L. Altshuler, W. B. Dickson, J. T. Vance, S. P. Roberts, and M. H. Dickinson
Short-amplitude high-frequency wing strokes determine the aerodynamics of honeybee flight
PNAS, December 13, 2005; 102(50): 18213 - 18218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. L. Altshuler, R. Dudley, and J. A. McGuire
Resolution of a paradox: Hummingbird flight at high elevation does not come without a cost
PNAS, December 21, 2004; 101(51): 17731 - 17736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Phillips
HOW HUMMINGBIRDS SCALE THE HEIGHTS
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2003; 206(18): 3115 - 3115.
[Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003