QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online July 23, 2003

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Combes, S. A. Articles by Daniel, T. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Combes, S. A. Articles by Daniel, T. L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 2999-3006 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00502

Into thin air: contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta

S. A. Combes^* and T. L. Daniel

Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: scombes{at}u.washington.edu)

Accepted 18 May 2003

During flapping flight, insect wings must withstand not only fluid-dynamic forces, but also inertial-elastic forces generated by the rapid acceleration and deceleration of their own mass. Estimates of overall aerodynamic and inertial forces vary widely, and the relative importance of these forces in determining passive wing deformations remains unknown. If aeroelastic interactions between a wing and the fluid-dynamic forces it generates are minor compared to the effects of wing inertia, models of insect flight that account for passive wing flexibility would be far simpler to develop. We used an experimental approach to examine the contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. We attached fresh Manduca wings to a motor and flapped them at a realistic wing-beat frequency and stroke amplitude. We compared wing bending in normal air versus helium (approx. 15% air density), in which the contribution of fluid-dynamic forces to wing deformations is significantly reduced. This 85% reduction in air density produced only slight changes in the pattern of Manduca wing deformations, suggesting that fluid-dynamic forces have a minimal effect on wing bending. We used a simplified finite element model of a wing to show that the differences observed between wings flapped in air versus helium are most likely due to fluid damping, rather than to aerodynamic forces. This suggests that damped finite element models of insect wings (with no fluid-dynamic forces included) may be able to predict overall patterns of wing deformation prior to calculations of aerodynamic force production, facilitating integrative models of insect flight.

Key words: insect flight, wing flexibility, wing bending, aerodynamic forces, inertial forces, finite element model, Manduca sexta

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Ishihara, Y. Yamashita, T. Horie, S. Yoshida, and T. Niho Passive maintenance of high angle of attack and its lift generation during flapping translation in crane fly wing J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2009; 212(23): 3882 - 3891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. E. Jackson, P. Segre, and K. P. Dial Precocial development of locomotor performance in a ground-dwelling bird (Alectoris chukar): negotiating a three-dimensional terrestrial environment Proc R Soc B, October 7, 2009; 276(1672): 3457 - 3466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Miller and C. S. Peskin Flexible clap and fling in tiny insect flight J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2009; 212(19): 3076 - 3090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Ristroph, G. J. Berman, A. J. Bergou, Z. J. Wang, and I. Cohen Automated hull reconstruction motion tracking (HRMT) applied to sideways maneuvers of free-flying insects J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2009; 212(9): 1324 - 1335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Vanella, T. Fitzgerald, S. Preidikman, E. Balaras, and B. Balachandran Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2009; 212(1): 95 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Hedrick and T. L. Daniel Flight control in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta: the inverse problem of hovering J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2006; 209(16): 3114 - 3130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Sane and N. P. Jacobson Induced airflow in flying insects II. Measurement of induced flow J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2006; 209(1): 43 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Borrell, J. A. Goldbogen, and R. Dudley Aquatic wing flapping at low Reynolds numbers: swimming kinematics of the Antarctic pteropod, Clione antarctica J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2005; 208(15): 2939 - 2949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. N. Balint and M. H. Dickinson Neuromuscular control of aerodynamic forces and moments in the blowfly, Calliphora vicina J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2004; 207(22): 3813 - 3838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Combes and T. L. Daniel Flexural stiffness in insect wings I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 2979 - 2987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Combes and T. L. Daniel Flexural stiffness in insect wings II. Spatial distribution and dynamic wing bending J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 2989 - 2997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]