QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dumont, E. R. Articles by Herrel, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dumont, E. R. Articles by Herrel, A.

The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 2117-2123 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00375

The effects of gape angle and bite point on bite force in bats

Elizabeth R. Dumont^1,* and Anthony Herrel²

¹ Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Morrill Science Center, 611 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003-9297, USA
² Laboratory of Functional Morphology, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerpen, Belgium

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: bdumont{at}bio.umass.edu)

Accepted 17 March 2003

Models of mammalian mastication predict that bite force is affected by both the degree of mouth opening (gape angle) and the point along the tooth row at which force is transferred to a food item (bite point). Despite the widespread use of these models in comparative analyses, experimental data documenting bite force in non-human mammals are extremely limited. The goal of this study is to document variation in non-stimulated bite force associated with change in gape angle and bite point in a broad range of species. We focus on plant-visiting bats because they exhibit a relatively primitive cranial morphology and are good models for generalized mammals. Assessments of the relationship between gape angle and bite force within and among species demonstrate that bite force decreases significantly as gape angle increases. The relationship between bite force and bite point within each of seven species demonstrates that unilateral molar biting universally generates the highest forces while the unilateral canine biting produces the lowest forces. Bilateral canine biting is intermediate. Beyond these general patterns, differences among species suggest that bite force reflects variation in craniofacial architecture. Finally, these data suggest that behavioral variation in gape angle and bite point may be important variables in comparative, functional analyses of feeding.

Key words: bat, bite force, gape, behavior, performance

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. Vinyard and B. A. Payseur Of "mice" and mammals: utilizing classical inbred mice to study the genetic architecture of function and performance in mammals Integr. Comp. Biol., June 24, 2008; (2008) icn063v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Gerry, J. B. Ramsay, M. N. Dean, and C. D. Wilga Evolution of asynchronous motor activity in paired muscles: effects of ecology, morphology, and phylogeny Integr. Comp. Biol., June 9, 2008; (2008) icn055v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Herrel, A. De Smet, L. F. Aguirre, and P. Aerts Morphological and mechanical determinants of bite force in bats: do muscles matter? J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2008; 211(1): 86 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. R. Dumont Feeding mechanisms in bats: variation within the constraints of flight Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 137 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]