QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hochachka, P. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hochachka, P. W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 2001-2009 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00402

Review Article

Intracellular convection, homeostasis and metabolic regulation

P. W. Hochachka

Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4

Accepted 17 March 2003

Two views currently dominate experimental approaches to metabolic regulation. The first, let us call it Model 1, assumes that cells behave like a watery bag of enzymes. The alternative Model 2, however, assumes that 3-dimensional order and structure constrain metabolite behavior. A major problem in cell metabolism is determining why essentially all metabolite concentrations are remarkably stable (homeostatic) over large changes in pathway fluxes–for convenience, this is termed the [s] stability paradox. During large-scale transitions from maintenance metabolic rates to maximally activated work, contrasting demands of intracellular homeostasis versus metabolic regulation obviously arise. Data accumulated over the last 3–4 decades now make it clear that the demands of homeostasis prevail: during rest–work transitions, metabolites such as ATP and O₂ are notably and rigorously homeostatic; other intermediates usually do not vary by more than 0.5- to threefold over the resting condition. This impressive homeostasis is maintained despite changes in pathway fluxes that can exceed two orders of magnitude. Classical or Model 1 approaches to this problem can explain metabolite homeostasis, but the mechanisms for each metabolite, each enzyme locus, are necessarily specific. Thus Model 1 approaches basically do not provide a global explanation for the [s] stability paradox. Model 2 takes a different tack and assumes that an intracellular convection system acts as an over-riding `assist' mechanism for facilitating enzyme–substrate encounter. Model 2 postulates that intracellular movement and convection are powered by macromolecular motors (unconventional myosins, dyneins, kinesin) running on actin or tubulin tracks. For fast and slow muscle fibers, microfilaments are concentrated near the periphery (where convection may be most important), but also extend throughout the actomyosin contractile apparatus both in horizontal and vertical dimensions. To this point in the development of the field, Model 1 and Model 2 approaches have operated as `two solitudes', each considering the other incompatible with its own experimental modus operandi. In order to finally assemble a model that can sensibly explain a realistic working range of metabolic systems, opening of channels of communication between the above two very differing views of metabolic regulation would seem to be the requirement for the future.

Key words: metabolic regulation, homeostasis, intracellular, diffusion, intracellular perfusion, oxygen delivery, oxygen regulation

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. van Hall, C. Lundby, M. Araoz, J. A. L. Calbet, M. Sander, and B. Saltin The lactate paradox revisited in lowlanders during acclimatization to 4100 m and in high-altitude natives J. Physiol., March 1, 2009; 587(5): 1117 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Rissanen, H. K. Tranberg, and M. Nikinmaa Oxygen availability regulates metabolism and gene expression in trout hepatocyte cultures Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): R1507 - R1515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Rezende, F. R. Gomes, J. L. Malisch, M. A. Chappell, and T. Garland Jr. Maximal oxygen consumption in relation to subordinate traits in lines of house mice selectively bred for high voluntary wheel running J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2006; 101(2): 477 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Saks, P. Dzeja, U. Schlattner, M. Vendelin, A. Terzic, and T. Wallimann Cardiac system bioenergetics: metabolic basis of the Frank-Starling law J. Physiol., March 1, 2006; 571(2): 253 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Rezende, T. Garland Jr, M. A. Chappell, J. L. Malisch, and F. R. Gomes Maximum aerobic performance in lines of Mus selected for high wheel-running activity: effects of selection, oxygen availability and the mini-muscle phenotype J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2006; 209(1): 115 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Kidd, R. Abu-Shumays, A. Katzen, J. C. Sisson, G. Jimenez, S. Pinchin, W. Sullivan, and D. Ish-Horowicz The {epsilon}-Subunit of Mitochondrial ATP Synthase Is Required for Normal Spindle Orientation During the Drosophila Embryonic Divisions Genetics, June 1, 2005; 170(2): 697 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]