|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Effects of load type (pollen or nectar) and load mass on hovering metabolic rate and mechanical power output in the honey bee Apis mellifera
1 Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1501,
USA
2 Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4004,
USA
3 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas,
Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
* Present address: Department of Integrative Biology, University of California,
Berkeley, 3060 Valley Life Sciences Building #3140, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140,
USA
Author for correspondence (e-mail:
j.harrison{at}asu.edu)
Accepted 28 February 2003
In this study we tested the effect of pollen and nectar loading on metabolic rate (in mW) and wingbeat frequency during hovering, and also examined the effect of pollen loading on wing kinematics and mechanical power output. Pollen foragers had hovering metabolic rates approximately 10% higher than nectar foragers, regardless of the amount of load carried. Pollen foragers also had a more horizontal body position and higher inclination of stroke plane than measured previously for honey bees (probably nectar foragers). Thorax temperatures ranked pollen > nectar > water foragers, and higher flight metabolic rate could explain the higher thorax temperature of pollen foragers. Load mass did not affect hovering metabolic rate or wingbeat frequency in a regression-model experiment. However, using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) design, loaded pollen and nectar foragers (mean loads 27% and 40% of body mass, respectively) significantly increased metabolic rate by 6%. Mean pollen loads of 18% of body mass had no effect on wingbeat frequency, stroke amplitude, body angle or inclination of stroke plane, but increased the calculated mechanical power output by 16–18% (depending on the method of estimating drag). A rise in lift coefficient as bees carry loads without increasing wingbeat frequency or stroke amplitude (and only minimal increases in metabolic rate) suggests an increased use of unsteady power-generating mechanisms.
Key words: flight metabolism, loading, power output, wing kinematics, insect, honey bee, Apis mellifera.
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. C. Nieh, A. Leon, S. Cameron, and R. Vandame Hot bumble bees at good food: thoracic temperature of feeding Bombus wilmattae foragers is tuned to sugar concentration J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2006; 209(21): 4185 - 4192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. E. Schilman and F. Roces Foraging energetics of a nectar-feeding ant: metabolic expenditure as a function of food-source profitability J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2006; 209(20): 4091 - 4101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.-P. Schippers, R. Dukas, R. W. Smith, J. Wang, K. Smolen, and G. B. McClelland Lifetime performance in foraging honeybees: behaviour and physiology J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2006; 209(19): 3828 - 3836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. L. Altshuler, W. B. Dickson, J. T. Vance, S. P. Roberts, and M. H. Dickinson Short-amplitude high-frequency wing strokes determine the aerodynamics of honeybee flight PNAS, December 13, 2005; 102(50): 18213 - 18218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. A. Woods Jr, B. Heinrich, and R. D. Stevenson Honeybee flight metabolic rate: does it depend upon air temperature? J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2005; 208(6): 1161 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Borrell and M. J. Medeiros Thermal stability and muscle efficiency in hovering orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini) J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(17): 2925 - 2933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Phillips ON A POLLEN HIGH J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2003; 206(11): 1767 - 1767. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
