QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Usherwood, J. R. Articles by Bertram, J. E. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Usherwood, J. R. Articles by Bertram, J. E. A.

The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 1631-1642 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00306

Understanding brachiation: insight from a collisional perspective

James R. Usherwood and John E. A. Bertram^*

Food, Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, Sandels Building, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: jbertram{at}garnet.acns.fsu.edu)

Accepted 21 February 2003

Gibbons are able to brachiate effectively through the forest canopy with a suspended swinging motion via contact with handholds. The swing phase is unlikely to be a cause of significant energy loss as pendulums are able to oscillate with only gradual mechanical energy dissipation. We consider the energetics associated with the transition of either a swing (during continuous-contact brachiation) or a ballistic flight (ricochetal brachiation) to a subsequent swing. In both styles of brachiation, kinematic data suggest that a gibbon overshoots the path that would allow a smooth transition into the swing phase. The sudden change in velocity due to such an overshoot is associated with a collision. Assuming neither the handhold nor the gibbon stores elastic strain energy, the energetic consequences of such overshoots can be calculated.

We suggest two reasons for overshooting smooth transition trajectories: in the case of continuous contact brachiation, excess mechanical energy can be maintained with a high amplitude swing, and an overshoot during ricochetal brachiation produces a safety margin.

The degree of energy loss with the transition to the swing phase is dependent both on the alignment of the pre- and post-transition paths, and on the kinetic energy at that instant. Active mechanisms reduce the effects of overshoots in both brachiation gaits. During continuous-contact brachiation, the path of the centre of mass can be controlled actively by flexion both of the trailing arm and the legs. During ricochetal brachiation, the length between the hand and the centre of mass (determining the subsequent swing path) can be controlled throughout the flight phase with leg flexion/extension. In addition, the elongated arms characteristic of gibbons improves the geometry of a collision for a given overshoot, and so may be viewed as a morphological adaptation reducing the energetic losses caused by overshooting for safety.

Key words: Gibbon, locomotion, collision, energy, pendulum, Hylobates lar

Related articles in JEB:

GIBBONS CUT THEIR LOSSES

Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2003 206: 1599-1600. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Usherwood, S. B. Williams, and A. M. Wilson Mechanics of dog walking compared with a passive, stiff-limbed, 4-bar linkage model, and their collisional implications J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2007; 210(3): 533 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Berges and A. Bowling Rebound, Slip, and Compliance in the Modeling and Analysis of Discrete Impacts in Legged Locomotion Journal of Vibration and Control, December 1, 2006; 12(12): 1407 - 1430. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. E. Vereecke, K. D'Aout, and P. Aerts The dynamics of hylobatid bipedalism: evidence for an energy-saving mechanism? J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 209(15): 2829 - 2838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Phillips GIBBONS CUT THEIR LOSSES J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2003; 206(10): 1599 - 1600. [Full Text]