|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Rheotaxis and prey detection in uniform currents by Lake Michigan mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi)
Parmly Hearing Institute and Department of Biology, Loyola University of Chicago, Il 60626, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: scoombs{at}luc.edu)
Accepted 1 October 2002
Lake Michigan mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi, exhibit a lateral-line mediated, unconditioned orienting response, which is part of the overall prey capture behavior of this species and can be triggered in visually deprived animals by both live (e.g. Daphnia magna) and artificial (e.g. chemically inert vibrating sphere) prey. However, the extent to which background water motions (e.g. currents) might mask the detection of biologically significant stimuli like these is almost entirely unknown, despite the fundamental nature and importance of this question. To examine this question, the orienting response of mottled sculpin was used to measure threshold sensitivity to a nearby artificial prey (a 50 Hz vibrating sphere) as a function of background noise level (unidirectional currents of different flow velocities). Because many fish show unconditioned rheotaxis to uniform currents, we also measured the fish's angular heading relative to the oncoming flow in the absence of the signal. Frequency distributions of fish headings revealed positive rheotaxis to flows as low as 4 cm s-1 and an increasing degree of alignment with the oncoming flow as a function of increasing flow velocity. Sculpin positioned in the upstream direction were able to detect relatively weak signals (estimated to be approx. 0.001-0.0001 peak—peak cm s-1 at the location of the fish) in the presence of strong background flows (2-8 cm s-1), and signal levels at threshold increased by less than twofold for a fourfold increase in flow velocity. These results are consistent with the idea that lateral line canals behave as high-pass filters to effectively reject low frequency noises such as those caused by slow d.c. currents.
Key words: rheotaxis, prey orientation, lateral line, mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. P. Windsor and M. J. McHenry The influence of viscous hydrodynamics on the fish lateral-line system Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2009; 49(6): 691 - 701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. P. Chagnaud, C. Brucker, M. H. Hofmann, and H. Bleckmann Measuring Flow Velocity and Flow Direction by Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Flow Fluctuations J. Neurosci., April 23, 2008; 28(17): 4479 - 4487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Gardiner and J. Atema Sharks need the lateral line to locate odor sources: rheotaxis and eddy chemotaxis J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2007; 210(11): 1925 - 1934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Palmer, M. Deffenbaugh, and A. F. Mensinger Sensitivity of the anterior lateral line to natural stimuli in the oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau (Linnaeus) J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2005; 208(18): 3441 - 3450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Phillips PICKING UP THE VIBES J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2003; 206(1): 5 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
