QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schul, J. Articles by Patterson, A. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schul, J. Articles by Patterson, A. C.

The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 141-152 (2003)
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00070

What determines the tuning of hearing organs and the frequency of calls? A comparative study in the katydid genus Neoconocephalus (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae)

Johannes Schul^* and Adam C. Patterson

Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, 207 Tucker Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: schulj{at}missouri.edu)

Accepted 10 October 2002

The calls of five syntopic species of Neoconocephalus varied significantly in their spectral composition. The center-frequency of the narrow-band low-frequency component varied from 7kHz to 15kHz among the five species. Hearing thresholds, as determined from whole nerve recordings, did not vary accordingly among the five species but were lowest in the range from 16kHz to 18kHz in all five species. Iso-intensity response functions were flat for stimulus intensities up to 27dB above threshold, indicating an even distribution of the best frequencies of individual receptor cells. At higher stimulus intensities, the intensity/response functions were steeper at frequencies above 35kHz than at lower frequencies. This suggests the presence of a second receptor cell population for such high frequencies, with 25-30dB higher thresholds. This receptor cell population is interpreted as an adaptation for bat avoidance. The transmission properties of the Neoconocephalus habitat (grassland) had low-pass characteristics for pure tones. Frequencies below 10kHz passed almost unaffected, while attenuation in excess of spherical attenuation increased at higher frequencies. Considering these transmission properties and the tuning of female hearing sensitivity, call frequencies of approximately 9-10kHz should be most effective as communication signals in this group of insects. It is discussed that the frequency of male calls is strongly influenced by bat predation and by the transmission properties of the habitat but is not strongly influenced by the tuning of the female hearing system.

Key words: Neoconocephalus, acoustic communication, frequency tuning, bushcricket, hearing threshold, call spectrum, sound transmission

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. M. ter Hofstede and J. H. Fullard The neuroethology of song cessation in response to gleaning bat calls in two species of katydids, Neoconocephalus ensiger and Amblycorypha oblongifolia J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 211(15): 2431 - 2441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. W. Bailey, J. R. McNabb, and M. Zuk Preexisting behavior facilitated the loss of a sexual signal in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 202 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Deily and J. Schul Spectral selectivity during phonotaxis: a comparative study in Neoconocephalus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2006; 209(9): 1757 - 1764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Deily and J. Schul Recognition of calls with exceptionally fast pulse rates: female phonotaxis in the genus Neoconocephalus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2004; 207(20): 3523 - 3529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]