QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fritsches, K. A. Articles by Marshall, N. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fritsches, K. A. Articles by Marshall, N. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Journal of Experimental Biology 205, 1241-1252 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited

Independent and conjugate eye movements during optokinesis in teleost fish

Kerstin A. Fritsches^* and N. Justin Marshall

Vision, Touch and Hearing Research Centre, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: Kerstin.Fritsches{at}uq.edu.au )

Accepted 22 February 2002

In response to movements involving a large part of the visual field, the eyes of vertebrates typically show an optokinetic nystagmus, a response in which both eyes are tightly yoked. Using a comparative approach, this study sets out to establish whether fish with independent spontaneous eye movements show independent optokinetic nystagmus in each eye. Two fish with independent spontaneous eye movements, the pipefish Corythoichthyes intestinalis and the sandlance Limnichthyes fasciatus were compared with the butterflyfish Chaetodon rainfordi, which exhibits tightly yoked eye movements. In the butterflyfish a single whole-field stimulus elicits conjugate optokinesis, whereas the sandlance and pipefish show asynchronous optokinetic movements. In a split drum experiment, when both eyes were stimulated in opposite directions with different speeds, both the sandlance and the pipefish compensated independently with each eye. The optokinetic response in the butterflyfish showed some disconjugacy but was generally confused. When one eye was occluded, the seeing eye was capable of driving the occluded eye in both the butterflyfish and the pipefish but not in the sandlance. Monocular occlusion therefore unmasks a link between the two eyes in the pipefish, which is overridden when both eyes receive visual input. The sandlance never showed any correlation between the eyes during optokinesis in all stimulus conditions. This suggests that there are different levels of linkage between the two eyes in the oculomotor system of teleosts, depending on the visual input.

Key words: eye movement, fish, optokinesis, conjugate eye movements, independent eye movement, teleost fish, Corythoichthyes intestinalis, Limnichthyes fasciatus, Chaetodon rainfordi

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. A. Masseck and K.-P. Hoffmann Responses to Moving Visual Stimuli in Pretectal Neurons of the Small-Spotted Dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 200 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]