|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Learning speed and contextual isolation in bumblebees
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK
* e-mail: t.s.collett{at}sussex.ac.uk
Accepted 23 January 2002
Bumblebees will learn to approach one of a pair of patterns (a 45° grating) and to avoid the other (a 135° grating) to reach a feeder, and to do the opposite to reach their nest (approach a 135° grating and avoid a 45° grating). These two potentially competing visuo-motor associations are insulated from each other because they are set in different contexts. We investigated what training conditions allow the two sets of associations to be acquired without mutual interference.
If the discrimination at the feeder has already been learnt, then the discrimination at the nest can be readily acquired without disrupting the bees' performance at the feeder. But, if the two are learnt simultaneously, there is mutual interference. Prior experience of the two contexts before the discriminations are learnt does not prevent interference. We conclude that visual patterns and contextual cues must already be associated with each other for a visuo-motor association to be isolated from the interfering effects of a competing association that is acquired in a separate context. This pattern of results was mimicked in a simple neural network with Hebbian synapses, in which local and contextual cues were bound together into a configural unit.
Key words: bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, visual learning, context, interference
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Pahl, H. Zhu, W. Pix, J. Tautz, and S. Zhang Circadian timed episodic-like memory a bee knows what to do when, and also where J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2007; 210(20): 3559 - 3567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Vladusich, J. M. Hemmi, and J. Zeil Honeybee odometry and scent guidance J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2006; 209(8): 1367 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Menzel and M. Giurfa Dimensions of cognition in an insect, the honeybee. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, March 1, 2006; 5(1): 24 - 40. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. D. Skow and E. M. Jakob Jumping spiders attend to context during learned avoidance of aposematic prey Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 34 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. D. Worden, A. K. Skemp, and D. R. Papaj Learning in two contexts: the effects of interference and body size in bumblebees J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2005; 208(11): 2045 - 2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Cheng Context cues eliminate retroactive interference effects in honeybees Apis mellifera J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2005; 208(6): 1019 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Dale, D. P. Harland, A. Manning-Jones, and T. S. Collett Weak and strong priming cues in bumblebee contextual learning J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2005; 208(1): 65 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Matsumoto and M. Mizunami Context-Dependent Olfactory Learning in an Insect Learn. Mem., May 1, 2004; 11(3): 288 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Komischke, M. Giurfa, H. Lachnit, and D. Malun Successive Olfactory Reversal Learning in Honeybees Learn. Mem., May 1, 2002; 9(3): 122 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
