spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lehrer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lehrer, M.
The Journal of Experimental Biology 205, 559-572 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited

Discrimination of closed shapes by two species of bee, Apis mellifera and Megachile rotundata

Raymond Campan1 and Miriam Lehrer2,*

1 Laboratoire d’Ethologie et Cognition Animale, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse, France and
2 Department of Neurobiology, Institute of Zoology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland

*Author for correspondence (e-mail: miriam{at}zool.unizh.ch or miriam.lehrer{at}ggaweb.ch)

Accepted 7 December 2001

In the present study, the performance of two bee species, the honeybee Apis mellifera and the leaf-cutter bee Megachile rotundata, in discriminating among various closed (convex) shapes was examined systematically for the first time. Bees were trained to each of five different shapes, a disc, a square, a diamond and two different triangles, all of the same area, using fresh bees in each experiment. In subsequent tests, the trained bees were given a choice between the learned shape and each of the other four shapes. Two sets of experiments were conducted with both species. In the first, solid black shapes were presented against a white background, thus providing a high luminance contrast. In the second, the shapes carried a random black-and-white pattern and were presented 5 cm in front of a similar pattern, thus producing motion contrast, rather than luminance contrast, against the background.

The results obtained with the solid shapes reveal that both bee species accomplish the discrimination, although the performance of the honeybee is significantly better than that of the leaf-cutter bee. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the various shapes differs between the two species. However, in neither species is the discrimination performance correlated with the amount of overlap of the black areas contained in the various pairs of shapes, suggesting that, in our experiments, shape discrimination is not based on a template-matching process. We propose that it is based on the use of local parameters situated at the outline of the shape, such as the position of angles or acute points and, in particular, the position and orientation of edges. This conclusion is supported by the finding that bees of both species accomplish the discrimination even with the patterned shapes. These shapes are visible only because of the discontinuity of the speed of image motion perceived at the edge between the shape and the background.

Key words: honeybee, Apis mellifera, leaf-cutter bee, Megachile rotundata, training, shape discrimination, convex shape, luminance contrast, motion contrast, vision.


Related articles in JEB:

On the Edge (p. 559)
Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2002 205: i. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Lehrer and R. Campan
Generalization of convex shapes by bees: what are shapes made of?
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2005; 208(17): 3233 - 3247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002