spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tammero, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Dickinson, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tammero, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Dickinson, M. H.
The Journal of Experimental Biology 205, 2785-2798 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited

Collision-avoidance and landing responses are mediated by separate pathways in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster

Lance F. Tammero1,* and Michael H. Dickinson2

1 UCB/UCSF Joint Bioengineering Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
2 Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: lancet{at}socrates.berkeley.edu)

Accepted 14 June 2002

Flies rely heavily on visual feedback for several aspects of flight control. As a fly approaches an object, the image projected across its retina expands, providing the fly with visual feedback that can be used either to trigger a collision-avoidance maneuver or a landing response. To determine how a fly makes the decision to land on or avoid a looming object, we measured the behaviors generated in response to an expanding image during tethered flight in a visual closed-loop flight arena. During these experiments, each fly varied its wing-stroke kinematics to actively control the azimuth position of a 15°x15° square within its visual field. Periodically, the square symmetrically expanded in both the horizontal and vertical directions. We measured changes in the fly's wing-stroke amplitude and frequency in response to the expanding square while optically tracking the position of its legs to monitor stereotyped landing responses. Although this stimulus could elicit both the landing responses and collision-avoidance reactions, separate pathways appear to mediate the two behaviors. For example, if the square is in the lateral portion of the fly's field of view at the onset of expansion, the fly increases stroke amplitude in one wing while decreasing amplitude in the other, indicative of a collision-avoidance maneuver. In contrast, frontal expansion elicits an increase in wing-beat frequency and leg extension, indicative of a landing response. To further characterize the sensitivity of these responses to expansion rate, we tested a range of expansion velocities from 100 to 10 000° s-1. Differences in the latency of both the collision-avoidance reactions and the landing responses with expansion rate supported the hypothesis that the two behaviors are mediated by separate pathways. To examine the effects of visual feedback on the magnitude and time course of the two behaviors, we presented the stimulus under open-loop conditions, such that the fly's response did not alter the position of the expanding square. From our results we suggest a model that takes into account the spatial sensitivities and temporal latencies of the collision-avoidance and landing responses, and is sufficient to schematically represent how the fly uses integration of motion information in deciding whether to turn or land when confronted with an expanding object.

Key words: looming, optic flow, saccades, landing response, Drosophila melanogaster, collision avoidance


Related articles in JEB:

Time Flies
Keri-Lee Page
JEB 2002 205: i. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. M. Chow and M. A. Frye
Context-dependent olfactory enhancement of optomotor flight control in Drosophila
J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 211(15): 2478 - 2485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Mronz and F.-O. Lehmann
The free-flight response of Drosophila to motion of the visual environment
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2026 - 2045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. Hesselberg and F.-O. Lehmann
Turning behaviour depends on frictional damping in the fruit fly Drosophila
J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2007; 210(24): 4319 - 4334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. A. Budick, M. B. Reiser, and M. H. Dickinson
The role of visual and mechanosensory cues in structuring forward flight in Drosophila melanogaster
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2007; 210(23): 4092 - 4103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. Medan, D. Oliva, and D. Tomsic
Characterization of Lobula Giant Neurons Responsive to Visual Stimuli That Elicit Escape Behaviors in the Crab Chasmagnathus
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2414 - 2428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. J. Duistermars, D. M. Chow, M. Condro, and M. A. Frye
The spatial, temporal and contrast properties of expansion and rotation flight optomotor responses in Drosophila
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3218 - 3227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. A. Bender and M. H. Dickinson
A comparison of visual and haltere-mediated feedback in the control of body saccades in Drosophila melanogaster
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 209(23): 4597 - 4606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. A. Bender and M. H. Dickinson
Visual stimulation of saccades in magnetically tethered Drosophila
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2006; 209(16): 3170 - 3182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. N. Fry and R. Wehner
Look and turn: landmark-based goal navigation in honey bees
J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2005; 208(20): 3945 - 3955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
N. Boeddeker and M. Egelhaaf
A single control system for smooth and saccade-like pursuit in blowflies
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2005; 208(8): 1563 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
M. H. Dickinson
The Initiation and Control of Rapid Flight Maneuvers in Fruit Flies
Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2005; 45(2): 274 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. F. Cooke and M. S. A. Graziano
Sensorimotor Integration in the Precentral Gyrus: Polysensory Neurons and Defensive Movements
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1648 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
L. F. Tammero, M. A. Frye, and M. H. Dickinson
Spatial organization of visuomotor reflexes in Drosophila
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2004; 207(1): 113 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. A. Frye and M. H. Dickinson
Motor output reflects the linear superposition of visual and olfactory inputs in Drosophila
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2004; 207(1): 123 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. Sherman and M. H. Dickinson
Summation of visual and mechanosensory feedback in Drosophila flight control
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2004; 207(1): 133 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. F. Cooke and M. S. A. Graziano
Defensive Movements Evoked by Air Puff in Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3317 - 3329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. A. Frye, M. Tarsitano, and M. H. Dickinson
Odor localization requires visual feedback during free flight in Drosophila melanogaster
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2003; 206(5): 843 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002