spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Essner, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Essner, R. L., Jr
The Journal of Experimental Biology 205, 2469-2477 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited

Three-dimensional launch kinematics in leaping, parachuting and gliding squirrels

Richard L. Essner, Jr

Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA

e-mail: richard.essner{at}ohio.edu

Accepted 23 May 2002

Leaping, parachuting and gliding are the primary means by which arboreal squirrels negotiate gaps in the canopy. There are notable differences among the three locomotor modes with respect to mid-air postures and aerodynamics, yet it is unclear whether variation should also be expected during the launch phase of locomotion. To address this question, launch kinematic profiles were compared in leaping (Tamias striatus), parachuting (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) and gliding (Glaucomys volans) squirrels. Animals were filmed launching to the ground from a platform using high-speed video. Statistical comparisons among taxa indicated that only six out of 23 variables were significantly different among the three species. Two were associated with tail kinematics and were a consequence of tail morphology. Two were forelimb-related and discriminated gliding from non-gliding taxa. The remaining two variables were performance attributes, indicating significant variation among the species in take-off velocity and horizontal range. The absence of significant differences in hindlimb kinematics indicates that propulsion is essentially identical in leaping, parachuting and gliding squirrels.

Key words: gliding, parachuting, leaping, take-off, kinematics, squirrel, Tamias striatus, Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, Glaucomys volans




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Jusufi, D. I. Goldman, S. Revzen, and R. J. Full
From the Cover: Active tails enhance arboreal acrobatics in geckos
PNAS, March 18, 2008; 105(11): 4215 - 4219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. E. Paskins, A. Bowyer, W. M. Megill, and J. S. Scheibe
Take-off and landing forces and the evolution of controlled gliding in northern flying squirrels Glaucomys sabrinus
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1413 - 1423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. J. Socha
Becoming airborne without legs: the kinematics of take-off in a flying snake, Chrysopelea paradisi
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2006; 209(17): 3358 - 3369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002