spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liechti, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bruderer, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liechti, F.
Right arrow Articles by Bruderer, L.
The Journal of Experimental Biology 205, 2461-2467 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited

Wingbeat frequency of barn swallows and house martins: a comparison between free flight and wind tunnel experiments

Felix Liechti* and Lukas Bruderer

Swiss Ornithological Institute, CH-6204 Sempach, Switzerland

* e-mail: felix.liechti{at}vogelwarte.ch

Accepted 14 May 2002

The flight paths and wingbeat patterns of 39 barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) and 26 house martins (Delichon urbica) were recorded by tracking radar during the spring migration. Depending mostly on flight angle, hirundines performed anything from continuous flapping flight during climbing to single pulse-like wing beats during descent. Unlike most other passerines, hirundines rarely showed regular flapping and rest phases, allowing them to be distinguished from other bird migrants by radar echo signatures. Effective wingbeat frequency (Feff) was calculated as the mean number of wing beats per second, including non-flapping phases. Under comparable flight conditions, Feff was higher in house martins than in barn swallows. Within species, Feff values were higher during climbing and slow flying than during descent. Of the variance in Feff, 71 % could be explained by climb rate, air speed and species; similar results were obtained in the wind tunnel. Under comparable flight conditions, barn swallows and house martins in free flight had significantly lower values of Feff than individuals in wind tunnel experiments (by 40 % and 32 %, respectively). This difference may at least partly be due to the shorter wings of the juveniles tested in the wind tunnel during autumn. However, it seems unlikely that this can account for all of the large difference. It is suggested that wind tunnel experiments might overestimate birds' flight costs compared with free flight.

Key words: barn swallow, Hirundo rustica, house martin, Delichon urbica, wingbeat pattern, intermittent flight, effective wingbeat frequency, wind tunnel, free flight, flight costs




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
W. W. Cochran, M. S. Bowlin, and M. Wikelski
Wingbeat frequency and flap-pause ratio during natural migratory flight in thrushes
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 134 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002