QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Podolsky, R. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Podolsky, R. D.

The Journal of Experimental Biology 205, 1657-1668 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited

Fertilization ecology of egg coats: physical versus chemical contributions to fertilization success of free-spawned eggs

Robert D. Podolsky

University of North Carolina, Department of Biology, CB 3280, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

E-mail: podolsky{at}unc.edu

Accepted 19 March 2002

Free-spawned eggs are typically enclosed within accessory structures that are shed early in development. Most research on the role of these structures in fertilization has focused on chemical constituents and their influence on sperm—egg interaction. Here I test an alternative hypothesis that accessory structures play an important physical role in fertilization by increasing the size and buoyancy of the egg, making it a better target for sperm. In the sand dollar Dendraster excentricus, the jelly coat increases egg target size sixfold. At nonsaturating sperm concentrations, fertilization declined consistently following jelly coat removal by two independent methods. Regression analysis using a standard fertilization kinetics model found that 54-73% of this decline on average was predicted by changes in the rate of sperm—egg collision, resulting from changes in egg target size and density. Sperm swimming speed, a key parameter in the model, did not vary as a function of sperm concentration or exposure to egg-water. The organic cost of jelly is a fraction of that of the ovum, providing an efficient means of extending target size beyond the ovum size that is optimal for larval or juvenile development. These results support the hypothesis that physical attributes of jelly coats can account for a significant portion of their contribution to fertilization, and may help to explain why coats and other accessory structures are often substantially larger than expected from the nature of chemical interactions between egg and sperm.

Key words: jelly coat, target size, egg size, sperm swimming, fertilization success, energy investment, broadcast-spawning, sand dollar, Dendraster excentricus

Related articles in JEB:

Size Counts

Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2002 205: i. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. V. Inamdar, T. Kim, Y.-K. Chung, A. M. Was, X. Xiang, C.-W. Wang, S. Takayama, C. M. Lastoskie, F. I. M. Thomas, and A. M. Sastry Assessment of sperm chemokinesis with exposure to jelly coats of sea urchin eggs and resact: a microfluidic experiment and numerical study J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 210(21): 3805 - 3820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Podolsky and A. L. Moran Integrating function across marine life cycles Integr. Comp. Biol., October 1, 2006; 46(5): 577 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Levitan The relationship between egg size and fertilization success in broadcast-spawning marine invertebrates Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2006; 46(3): 298 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Mah, W. J. Swanson, and V. D. Vacquier Positive Selection in the Carbohydrate Recognition Domains of Sea Urchin Sperm Receptor for Egg Jelly (suREJ) Proteins Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 533 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Riffell, P. J. Krug, and R. K. Zimmer The ecological and evolutionary consequences of sperm chemoattraction PNAS, March 30, 2004; 101(13): 4501 - 4506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]