|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion
Institute of Fluid Mechanics, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, P.R. China
*e-mail: sunmao{at}public.fhnet.cn.net
Accepted 19 October 2001
A computational fluid-dynamic analysis was conducted to study the unsteady aerodynamics of a model fruit fly wing. The wing performs an idealized flapping motion that emulates the wing motion of a fruit fly in normal hovering flight. The Navier–Stokes equations are solved numerically. The solution provides the flow and pressure fields, from which the aerodynamic forces and vorticity wake structure are obtained. Insights into the unsteady aerodynamic force generation process are gained from the force and flow-structure information.
Considerable lift can be produced when the majority of the wing rotation is conducted near the end of a stroke or wing rotation precedes stroke reversal (rotation advanced), and the mean lift coefficient can be more than twice the quasi-steady value. Three mechanisms are responsible for the large lift: the rapid acceleration of the wing at the beginning of a stroke, the absence of stall during the stroke and the fast pitching-up rotation of the wing near the end of the stroke.
When half the wing rotation is conducted near the end of a stroke and half at the beginning of the next stroke (symmetrical rotation), the lift at the beginning and near the end of a stroke becomes smaller because the effects of the first and third mechanisms above are reduced. The mean lift coefficient is smaller than that of the rotation-advanced case, but is still 80 % larger than the quasi-steady value. When the majority of the rotation is delayed until the beginning of the next stroke (rotation delayed), the lift at the beginning and near the end of a stroke becomes very small or even negative because the effect of the first mechanism above is cancelled and the third mechanism does not apply in this case. The mean lift coefficient is much smaller than in the other two cases.
Key words: insect, flight, fruit fly, Drosophila sp., wing, computational fluid dynamics, unsteady aerodynamics.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. M. Walker, A. L. R. Thomas, and G. K. Taylor Deformable wing kinematics in free-flying hoverflies J R Soc Interface, January 6, 2010; 7(42): 131 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Ishihara, Y. Yamashita, T. Horie, S. Yoshida, and T. Niho Passive maintenance of high angle of attack and its lift generation during flapping translation in crane fly wing J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2009; 212(23): 3882 - 3891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Wu, Y. L. Zhang, and M. Sun Hovering of model insects: simulation by coupling equations of motion with Navier-Stokes equations J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2009; 212(20): 3313 - 3329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Zhao, Q. Huang, X. Deng, and S. P. Sane Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings J R Soc Interface, August 19, 2009; (2009) rsif.2009.0200v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Ishihara, T. Horie, and M. Denda A two-dimensional computational study on the fluid-structure interaction cause of wing pitch changes in dipteran flapping flight J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2009; 212(1): 1 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Vanella, T. Fitzgerald, S. Preidikman, E. Balaras, and B. Balachandran Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2009; 212(1): 95 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Liu and M. Sun Wing kinematics measurement and aerodynamics of hovering droneflies J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2014 - 2025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Lu and G. X. Shen Three-dimensional flow structures and evolution of the leading-edge vortices on a flapping wing J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1221 - 1230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Aono, F. Liang, and H. Liu Near- and far-field aerodynamics in insect hovering flight: an integrated computational study J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 239 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sun and J. K. Wang Flight stabilization control of a hovering model insect J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 210(15): 2714 - 2722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Ramamurti and W. C. Sandberg A computational investigation of the three-dimensional unsteady aerodynamics of Drosophila hovering and maneuvering J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2007; 210(5): 881 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Lu, G. X. Shen, and G. J. Lai Dual leading-edge vortices on flapping wings J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2006; 209(24): 5005 - 5016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Sane Induced airflow in flying insects I. A theoretical model of the induced flow J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2006; 209(1): 32 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. K. Wang and M. Sun A computational study of the aerodynamics and forewing-hindwing interaction of a model dragonfly in forward flight J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2005; 208(19): 3785 - 3804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sun and Y. Xiong Dynamic flight stability of a hovering bumblebee J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2005; 208(3): 447 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Usherwood, T. L. Hedrick, C. P. McGowan, and A. A. Biewener Dynamic pressure maps for wings and tails of pigeons in slow, flapping flight, and their energetic implications J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2005; 208(2): 355 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Miller and C. S. Peskin When vortices stick: an aerodynamic transition in tiny insect flight J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(17): 3073 - 3088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. L. Hedrick, J. R. Usherwood, and A. A. Biewener Wing inertia and whole-body acceleration: an analysis of instantaneous aerodynamic force production in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) flying across a range of speeds J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2004; 207(10): 1689 - 1702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Wu and M. Sun Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flapping wing J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2004; 207(7): 1137 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. J. Wang, J. M. Birch, and M. H. Dickinson Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 207(3): 449 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Sane The aerodynamics of insect flight J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4191 - 4208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Combes and T. L. Daniel Into thin air: contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 2999 - 3006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sun and J. H. Wu Aerodynamic force generation and power requirements in forward flight in a fruit fly with modeled wing motion J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 3065 - 3083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Birch and M. H. Dickinson The influence of wing-wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2003; 206(13): 2257 - 2272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Walker Rotational lift: something different or more of the same? J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2002; 205(24): 3783 - 3792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sun and J. Tang Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila virilis J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2002; 205(16): 2413 - 2427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
