spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, O. N.
Right arrow Articles by Goller, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, O. N.
Right arrow Articles by Goller, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Experimental Biology 205, 25-35 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited

Direct observation of syringeal muscle function in songbirds and a parrot

Ole Næsbye Larsen* and Franz Goller{dagger}

Centre for Sound Communication, Institute of Biology, SDU-Odense University, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark and Medical Sciences Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
{dagger} Present address: Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South, 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA

*e-mail: onl{at}biology.sdu.dk

Accepted 31 October 2001

The role of syringeal muscles in controlling the aperture of the avian vocal organ, the syrinx, was evaluated directly for the first time by observing and filming through an endoscope while electrically stimulating different muscle groups of anaesthetised birds.

In songbirds (brown thrashers, Toxostoma rufum, and cardinals, Cardinalis cardinalis), direct observations of the biomechanical effects of contraction largely confirm the functions of the intrinsic syringeal muscles proposed from indirect studies. Contraction of the dorsal muscles, m. syringealis dorsalis (dS) and m. tracheobronchialis dorsalis, constricts the syringeal lumen and thus reduces airflow by adducting connective tissue masses, the medial (ML) and lateral (LL) labia. Activity of the medial portion of the dS appears to affect the position of the ML and, consequently, plays a previously undescribed role in aperture control. Under the experimental conditions used in this study, full constriction of the syringeal lumen could not be achieved by stimulating adductor muscles. Full closure may require simultaneous activation of extrinsic syringeal muscles or the supine positioning of the bird may have exerted excessive tension on the syrinx. Contraction of m. tracheobronchialis ventralis enlarges the syringeal lumen and thus increases airflow by abducting the LL but does not affect the ML. The largest syringeal muscle, m. syringealis ventralis, plays a minor role, if any, in direct aperture control and thus in gating airflow.

In parrots (cockatiels, Nymphicus hollandicus), direct observations show that even during quiet respiration the lateral tympaniform membranes (LTMs) are partially adducted into the tracheal lumen to form a narrow slot. Contraction of the superficial intrinsic muscle, m. syringealis superficialis, adducts the LTMs further into the tracheal lumen but does not close the syringeal aperture fully. The intrinsic deep muscle, m. syringealis profundus, abducts the LTMs through cranio-laterad movement of a paired, protruding half-ring. The weakly developed extrinsic m. sternotrachealis seems to increase tension in the ipsilateral LTM but does not move it in or out of the syringeal lumen.

Key words: brain stimulation, brown thrasher, Toxostoma rufum, cockatiel, Nymphicus hollandicus, endoscopic analysis, muscle stimulation, Northern cardinal, Cardinalis cardinalis, syrinx.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. P. H. Elemans, M. Muller, O. N. Larsen, and J. L. van Leeuwen
Amplitude and frequency modulation control of sound production in a mechanical model of the avian syrinx
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2009; 212(8): 1212 - 1224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J R Soc InterfaceHome page
C. P.H Elemans, R. Zaccarelli, and H. Herzel
Biomechanics and control of vocalization in a non-songbird
J R Soc Interface, July 6, 2008; 5(24): 691 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Amador, F. Goller, and G. B. Mindlin
Frequency Modulation During Song in a Suboscine Does Not Require Vocal Muscles
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2383 - 2389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. P. H. Elemans, I. L. Y. Spierts, M. Hendriks, H. Schipper, U. K. Muller, and J. L. van Leeuwen
Syringeal muscles fit the trill in ring doves (Streptopelia risoria L.)
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2006; 209(5): 965 - 977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
S. Ward, H. M. Lampe, and P. J. B. Slater
Singing is not energetically demanding for pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2004; 15(3): 477 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. J. L. Beckers, R. A. Suthers, and C. t. Cate
Mechanisms of frequency and amplitude modulation in ring dove song
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2003; 206(11): 1833 - 1843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002