|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Three-dimensional morphometry of spinal cord injury following polyethylene glycol treatment
Center for Paralysis Research, Institute for Applied Neurology, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1244, USA
*e-mail: cpr{at}vet.purdue.edu
Accepted 16 October 2001
We are developing a novel means of restoring function after severe acute spinal cord injury. This involves a brief application of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to the site of injury. In the companion paper, we have shown that a delayed application of PEG can produce strikingly significant physiological and behavioral recovery in 90100 % of spinal-cord-injured guinea pigs. In the present paper, we used three-dimensional computer reconstructions of PEG-treated and sham-treated spinal cords to determine whether the pathological character of a 1-month-old injury is ameliorated by application of PEG. Using a novel isocontouring algorithm, we show that immediate PEG treatment and treatment delayed by up to 7 h post-injury statistically increased the volume of intact spinal parenchyma and reduced the amount of cystic cavitation. Furthermore, in PEG-treated animals, the lesion was more focal and less diffuse throughout the damaged segment of the spinal cord, so that control cords showed a significantly extended lesion surface area. This three-dimensional computer evaluation showed that the functional recovery produced by topical application of a hydrophilic polymer is accompanied by a reduction in spinal cord damage.
Key words: three-dimensional reconstruction, computer visualization, morphometry, spinal cord injury, neurotrauma, cavitation.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. B. Borgens, R. Shi, and D. Bohnert Behavioral recovery from spinal cord injury following delayed application of polyethylene glycol J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2002; 205(1): 1 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||