spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Experimental Biology 205, 121-129 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited

A comparison of nutritional regulation in solitarious- and gregarious-phase nymphs of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria

S. J. Simpson*, D. Raubenheimer, S. T. Behmer, A. Whitworth and G. A. Wright

Department of Zoology and University Museum of Natural History, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK

*e-mail: stephen.simpson{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk

Accepted 26 October 2001

Nutritional regulatory responses were compared for the cryptic ‘solitarious’ and the conspicuously coloured, aggregating ‘gregarious’ phases of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. The desert locust has the genetic potential to exist in either phase, changing between them within a lifetime and epigenetically across generations. Our aim was to compare final-instar nymphs of the two phases with respect to key nutritional variables, including (i) points of regulated intake (the ‘intake target’) for protein and carbohydrate, (ii) the nature of trade-offs between over-eating nutrients in excess and under-eating those in deficit when fed nutritionally unbalanced foods, (iii) diet-related patterns of nutrient utilisation, and (iv) the performance consequences of eating nutritionally unbalanced diets. When provided with pairs of nutritionally unbalanced but complementary foods, both phases regulated their intake of protein and carbohydrate to a similar point. However, when confined to foods that were of unbalanced protein to carbohydrate ratio, gregarious nymphs ate more than solitarious insects. Both phases regulated protein growth, but gregarious insects did so to a lower adult body protein content and converted ingested protein to growth less efficiently. When fed a food high in carbohydrate and low in protein, gregarious nymphs deposited more body lipid and survived less well than did solitarious insects. Solitarious nymphs developed more quickly than gregarious nymphs except on the two most extremely unbalanced diets, on which development time was similar. The results are discussed with respect to the different nutritional ecologies of the two phases and used to develop the hypothesis that animals have evolved to trade-off the cost of eating excess of a nutritionally unbalanced diet against the probability of encountering foods of complementary composition in the future.

Key words: Schistocerca gregaria, desert locust, phase, maternal inheritance, nutrition, feeding, behaviour.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. P. Lomborg and S. Toft
Nutritional enrichment increases courtship intensity and improves mating success in male spiders
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2009; 20(4): 700 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. P. Lee, S. T. Behmer,, and S. J. Simpson,
Nutrient regulation in relation to diet breadth: a comparison of Heliothis sister species and a hybrid
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2006; 209(11): 2076 - 2084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. Despland and M. Noseworthy
How well do specialist feeders regulate nutrient intake? Evidence from a gregarious tree-feeding caterpillar
J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2006; 209(7): 1301 - 1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. T. Behmer, C. E. Belt, and M. S. Shapiro
Variable rewards and discrimination ability in an insect herbivore: what and how does a hungry locust learn?
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2005; 208(18): 3463 - 3473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. M. Rogers, T. Matheson, K. Sasaki, K. Kendrick, S. J. Simpson, and M. Burrows
Substantial changes in central nervous system neurotransmitters and neuromodulators accompany phase change in the locust
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2004; 207(20): 3603 - 3617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. Raubenheimer and S. J. Simpson
Nutrient balancing in grasshoppers: behavioural and physiological correlates of dietary breadth
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2003; 206(10): 1669 - 1681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002