QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Farina, W. M. Articles by Wainselboim, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Farina, W. M. Articles by Wainselboim, A. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 204, Issue 9 1653-1658, Copyright © 2001 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Changes in the thoracic temperature of honeybees while receiving nectar from foragers collecting at different reward rates

WM Farina and AJ Wainselboim
Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Facultad de Ciencas Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad universitaria, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. walter@bg.fcen.uba.ar

Mouth-to-mouth food exchange in eusocial insects (trophallaxis) contributes to the organization of complex social activities. In the case of honeybees, foragers returning from a nectar source transfer the food collected to receiver colony-mates through oral contact. Previous studies have shown that the speed of nectar transfer within each contact (unloading rate) increases when foragers return from feeding sites with higher profitability, i.e. with more concentrated sugar solutions or higher solution flow rates. However, there is no evidence that the nectar unloading rate is actually evaluated by hive-mates during food exchange. To investigate this, trophallaxis between donor bees returning from a feeder with different flow rates of sucrose solution (range 1.0-8.2 microl min(-1) of 50% w/w sucrose solution) and receiver hive-mates was studied by combining behavioural and infrared thermal analysis. The results show that when foraging bees returned from a feeder delivering a higher flow rate they initiated unloading at higher thoracic temperatures and transferred the solution at higher speed. During these food exchanges, the thoraces of receiver bees warmed up faster in proportion to increasing forager temperature and unloading rate. Therefore, whatever the variable actually evaluated by receivers (mostly nectar processors, i.e. bees that handle nectar in the hive) during trophallaxis (unloading rate and/or donor thoracic temperature), they raised their activity level in proportion to that of the foragers. In this way, receiver bees will intensify their nectar processing when nectar foragers return from more profitable sites.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. J. Hammer, C. Hata, and J. C. Nieh Thermal learning in the honeybee, Apis mellifera J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2009; 212(23): 3928 - 3934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Nieh, A. Leon, S. Cameron, and R. Vandame Hot bumble bees at good food: thoracic temperature of feeding Bombus wilmattae foragers is tuned to sugar concentration J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2006; 209(21): 4185 - 4192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Nieh and D. Sanchez Effect of food quality, distance and height on thoracic temperature in the stingless bee Melipona panamica J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2005; 208(20): 3933 - 3943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M Farina, C. Gruter, and P. C Diaz Social learning of floral odours inside the honeybee hive Proc R Soc B, September 22, 2005; 272(1575): 1923 - 1928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]