spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruderer, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bilo, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruderer, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bilo, D.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 204, Issue 8 1473-1484, Copyright © 2001 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Flexibility in flight behaviour of barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) and house martins (Delichon urbica) tested in a wind tunnel

L Bruderer, F Liechti and D Bilo
Swiss Ornithological Institute, CH-6204 Sempach, Switzerland and University of the Saarland, D-66123 Saarbrucken, Germany. felix.liechti@vogelwarte.ch

The flight behaviour of barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) and house martins (Delichon urbica) was tested in a wind tunnel at 15 combinations of flight angles and speeds. In contrast to that of most other small passerines, the intermittent flight of hirundines rarely consists of regular patterns of flapping and rest phases. To vary mechanical power output, both species used intermittent flight, controlling the number of single, pulse-like wingbeats per unit time. House martins in descent tended to concentrate their wingbeats into bursts and performed true gliding flight during rest phases. Barn swallows mainly performed partial bounds during brief interruptions of upstrokes, which they progressively prolonged with decreasing flight angle. Thus, identification of distinct flapping phases to calculate wingbeat frequencies was not feasible. Instead, an effective wingbeat frequency for flight intervals of 20 s, including partial bounds, was introduced. The effective wingbeat frequencies of house martins (N=3) ranged from 2 to 10.5 s(-)(1), those of barn swallows (N=4) from 2.5 to 8.5 s(-)(1). In both hirundine species, effective wingbeat frequency was found to decrease almost linearly with decreasing flight angle. With changes in air speed, wingbeat frequency varied according to a U-shaped curve, suggesting a minimum power speed of roughly 9 m s(-)(1). The duration of the down- and upstrokes varied systematically depending on flight angle and air speed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
W. W. Cochran, M. S. Bowlin, and M. Wikelski
Wingbeat frequency and flap-pause ratio during natural migratory flight in thrushes
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 134 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. W. Tobalske
Biomechanics of bird flight
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3135 - 3146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. D. Bullen and N. L. McKenzie
Scaling bat wingbeat frequency and amplitude
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2002; 205(17): 2615 - 2626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F. Liechti and L. Bruderer
Wingbeat frequency of barn swallows and house martins: a comparison between free flight and wind tunnel experiments
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2002; 205(16): 2461 - 2467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001