QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gaylord, B. Articles by Denny, M. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gaylord, B. Articles by Denny, M. W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 204, Issue 7 1347-1360, Copyright © 2001 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Consequences of transient fluid forces for compliant benthic organisms

B Gaylord, BB Hale and MW Denny
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA and Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA. gaylord@lifesci.ucsb.edu

The diversity of form among benthic marine plants and animals on rocky coasts is remarkable. Stiff and strong organisms grow alongside others that are compliant and flimsy. Given the severity of wave action on many shores and thus the potential for the imposition of large hydrodynamic forces, this immediately raises the question of how, from this overall spectrum of designs, flexible and weak organisms survive. A number of explanations have been proposed, most emphasizing one or more of several possible advantages of deformability. Here, we explore quantitatively two of the more common of these explanations: (i) that strength can be traded against extensibility in allowing stretchy organisms to withstand transient wave forces, and (ii) that greater compliance (and thus longer organism response times) allows universally for the amelioration of brief loads. We find that, although these explanations contain kernels of validity and are accurate for a subset of conditions, they are not as general as has often been assumed.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Gaylord, M. W. Denny, and M. A. R. Koehl Flow Forces on Seaweeds: Field Evidence for Roles of Wave Impingement and Organism Inertia Biol. Bull., December 1, 2008; 215(3): 295 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. T. Martone and M. W. Denny To break a coralline: mechanical constraints on the size and survival of a wave-swept seaweed J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2008; 211(21): 3433 - 3441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Mach, B. B. Hale, M. W. Denny, and D. V. Nelson Death by small forces: a fracture and fatigue analysis of wave-swept macroalgae J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 210(13): 2231 - 2243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Boller and E. Carrington Interspecific comparison of hydrodynamic performance and structural properties among intertidal macroalgae J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2007; 210(11): 1874 - 1884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Harder, C. L. Hurd, and T. Speck Comparison of mechanical properties of four large, wave-exposed seaweeds Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1426 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. T. Martone Size, strength and allometry of joints in the articulated coralline Calliarthron J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2006; 209(9): 1678 - 1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Denny and B. Gaylord The mechanics of wave-swept algae J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2002; 205(10): 1355 - 1362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]