spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elphick, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Melarange, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elphick, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Melarange, R.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 204, Issue 5 875-885, Copyright © 2001 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Neural control of muscle relaxation in echinoderms

MR Elphick and R Melarange
School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK. M.R.Elphick@qmw.ac.uk

Smooth muscle relaxation in vertebrates is regulated by a variety of neuronal signalling molecules, including neuropeptides and nitric oxide (NO). The physiology of muscle relaxation in echinoderms is of particular interest because these animals are evolutionarily more closely related to the vertebrates than to the majority of invertebrate phyla. However, whilst in vertebrates there is a clear structural and functional distinction between visceral smooth muscle and skeletal striated muscle, this does not apply to echinoderms, in which the majority of muscles, whether associated with the body wall skeleton and its appendages or with visceral organs, are made up of non-striated fibres. The mechanisms by which the nervous system controls muscle relaxation in echinoderms were, until recently, unknown. Using the cardiac stomach of the starfish Asterias rubens as a model, it has been established that the NO-cGMP signalling pathway mediates relaxation. NO also causes relaxation of sea urchin tube feet, and NO may therefore function as a 'universal' muscle relaxant in echinoderms. The first neuropeptides to be identified in echinoderms were two related peptides isolated from Asterias rubens known as SALMFamide-1 (S1) and SALMFamide-2 (S2). Both S1 and S2 cause relaxation of the starfish cardiac stomach, but with S2 being approximately ten times more potent than S1. SALMFamide neuropeptides have also been isolated from sea cucumbers, in which they cause relaxation of both gut and body wall muscle. Therefore, like NO, SALMFamides may also function as 'universal' muscle relaxants in echinoderms. The mechanisms by which SALMFamides cause relaxation of echinoderm muscle are not known, but several candidate signal transduction pathways are discussed here. The SALMFamides do not, however, appear to act by promoting release of NO, and muscle relaxation in echinoderms is therefore probably regulated by at least two neuronal signalling systems acting in parallel. Recently, other neuropeptides that influence muscle tone have been isolated from the sea cucumber Stichopus japonicus using body wall muscle as a bioassay, but at present SALMFamide peptides are the only ones that have been found to have a direct relaxing action on echinoderm muscle. One of the Stichopus japonicus peptides (holothurin 1), however, causes a reduction in the magnitude of electrically evoked muscle contraction in Stichopus japonicus and also causes 'softening' of the body wall dermis, a 'mutable connective tissue'. It seems most likely that this effect of holothurin 1 on body wall dermis is mediated by constituent muscle cells, and the concept of 'mutable connective tissue' in echinoderms may therefore need to be re-evaluated to incorporate the involvement of muscle, as proposed recently for the spine ligament in sea urchins.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. R. Elphick and M. C. Thorndyke
Molecular characterisation of SALMFamide neuropeptides in sea urchins
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2005; 208(22): 4273 - 4282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
N. Takemae and T. Motokawa
Mechanical Properties of the Isolated Catch Apparatus of the Sea Urchin Spine Joint: Muscle Fibers Do Not Contribute to Passive Stiffness Changes
Biol. Bull., February 1, 2005; 208(1): 29 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
L. F. Gainey Jr and M. J. Greenberg
Nitric oxide mediates seasonal muscle potentiation in clam gills
J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2003; 206(19): 3507 - 3520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. Melarange and M. R. Elphick
Comparative analysis of nitric oxide and SALMFamide neuropeptides as general muscle relaxants in starfish
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2003; 206(5): 893 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
I. C. Wilkie
Is muscle involved in the mechanical adaptability of echinoderm mutable collagenous tissue?
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2002; 205(2): 159 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. Hill
Role of Ca(2+) in excitation-contraction coupling in echinoderm muscle: comparison with role in other tissues
J. Exp. Biol., January 3, 2001; 204(5): 897 - 908.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001