QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schulze, W. Articles by Schul, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schulze, W. Articles by Schul, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 204, Issue 4 733-740, Copyright © 2001 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Ultrasound avoidance behaviour in the bushcricket Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)

W Schulze and J Schul
Institut fur Zoologie II, Friedrich-Alexander Universitat, Staudtstrasse 5, Germany.

The responses of female Tettigonia viridissima to simulated bat echolocation calls were examined during tethered flight. The insects responded with three distinct behaviours, which occurred at graded stimulus intensities. At low intensities (threshold 54 dB SPL), T. viridissima responded by steering away from the sound source (negative phonotaxis). At intensities approximately 10 dB higher, beating of the hindwing was interrupted, although the insect remained in the flight posture. A diving response (cessation of the wingbeat, closure of the forewings and alignment of the legs against the body) occurred with a threshold of 76 dB SPL. Considering these thresholds, we estimate that the diving response occurs at approximately the sound amplitude at which many aerial-hawking bats first receive echoes from the insect. The other behaviours probably occur before the bat detects the insect and should therefore be interpreted as early avoidance behaviours. The repertoire of startle responses in T. viridissima, with directional and non-directional components, is similar to those of crickets and moths, but quite different from those described for another bushcricket (Neoconocephalus ensiger), which shows only a non-directional response. This supports the conclusion that bat-evasive behaviours are not conserved within the Tettigoniidae, but instead are shaped by the ecological constraints of the insects.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. M. ter Hofstede and J. H. Fullard The neuroethology of song cessation in response to gleaning bat calls in two species of katydids, Neoconocephalus ensiger and Amblycorypha oblongifolia J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 211(15): 2431 - 2441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Triblehorn, K. Ghose, K. Bohn, C. F. Moss, and D. D. Yager Free-flight encounters between praying mantids (Parasphendale agrionina) and bats (Eptesicus fuscus) J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2008; 211(4): 555 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Russo, G. Jones, and R. Arlettaz Echolocation and passive listening by foraging mouse-eared bats Myotis myotis and M. blythii J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2007; 210(1): 166 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T. T. Plachta, J. Song, M. B. Halvorsen, and A. N. Popper Neuronal Encoding of Ultrasonic Sound by a Fish J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2590 - 2597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Schul and A. C. Patterson What determines the tuning of hearing organs and the frequency of calls? A comparative study in the katydid genus Neoconocephalus (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2003; 206(1): 141 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]