|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 204, Issue 3 543-557, Copyright © 2001 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
MA MacIver, NM Sharabash and ME Nelson
The Neuroscience Program, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Animals can actively influence the content and quality of sensory information they acquire from the environment through the positioning of peripheral sensory surfaces. This study investigated receptor surface positioning during prey-capture behavior in weakly electric gymnotiform fish of the genus Apteronotus. Infrared video techniques and three-dimensional model-based tracking methods were used to provide quantitative information on body position and conformation as black ghost (A. albifrons) and brown ghost (A. leptorhynchus) knifefish hunted for prey (Daphnia magna) in the dark. We found that detection distance depends on the electrical conductivity of the surrounding water. Best performance was observed at low water conductivity (2.8 cm mean detection distance and 2 % miss rate at 35 microS cm(-)(1), A. albifrons) and poorest performance at high conductivity (1.5 cm mean detection distance and 11 % miss rate at 600 microS cm(-)(1), A. albifrons). The observed conductivity-dependence implies that nonvisual prey detection in Apteronotus is likely to be dominated by the electrosense over the range of water conductivities experienced by the animal in its natural environment. This result provides the first evidence for the involvement of electrosensory cues in the prey-capture behavior of gymnotids, but it leaves open the possibility that both the high-frequency (tuberous) and low-frequency (ampullary) electroreceptors may contribute. We describe an electrosensory orienting response to prey, whereby the fish rolls its body following detection to bring the prey above the dorsum. This orienting response and the spatial distribution of prey at the time of detection highlight the importance of the dorsal surface of the trunk for electrosensory signal acquisition. Finally, quantitative analysis of fish motion demonstrates that Apteronotus can adapt its trajectory to account for post-detection motion of the prey, suggesting that it uses a closed-loop adaptive tracking strategy, rather than an open-loop ballistic strike strategy, to intercept the prey.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. M Postlethwaite, T. M Psemeneki, J. Selimkhanov, M. Silber, and M. A MacIver Optimal movement in the prey strikes of weakly electric fish: a case study of the interplay of body plan and movement capability J R Soc Interface, May 6, 2009; 6(34): 417 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. Shirgaonkar, O. M. Curet, N. A. Patankar, and M. A. MacIver The hydrodynamics of ribbon-fin propulsion during impulsive motion J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2008; 211(21): 3490 - 3503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. R. Solberg, K. M. Lynch, and M. A. MacIver Active Electrolocation for Underwater Target Localization The International Journal of Robotics Research, May 1, 2008; 27(5): 529 - 548. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. H. Mehaffey, L. Maler, and R. W. Turner Intrinsic Frequency Tuning in ELL Pyramidal Cells Varies Across Electrosensory Maps J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2641 - 2655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. H. Mehaffey, F. R. Fernandez, L. Maler, and R. W. Turner Regulation of Burst Dynamics Improves Differential Encoding of Stimulus Frequency by Spike Train Segregation J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 939 - 951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Gussin, J. Benda, and L. Maler Limits of Linear Rate Coding of Dynamic Stimuli by Electroreceptor Afferents J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2917 - 2929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. J. Cowan and E. S. Fortune The Critical Role of Locomotion Mechanics in Decoding Sensory Systems J. Neurosci., January 31, 2007; 27(5): 1123 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Babineau, A. Longtin, and J. E. Lewis Modeling the electric field of weakly electric fish J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2006; 209(18): 3636 - 3651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.-M. M. Oswald, M. J. Chacron, B. Doiron, J. Bastian, and L. Maler Parallel Processing of Sensory Input by Bursts and Isolated Spikes J. Neurosci., May 5, 2004; 24(18): 4351 - 4362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. Lewis and L. Maler Synaptic Dynamics on Different Time Scales in a Parallel Fiber Feedback Pathway of the Weakly Electric Fish J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 1064 - 1070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. Lewis and L. Maler Dynamics of Electrosensory Feedback: Short-Term Plasticity and Inhibition in a Parallel Fiber Pathway J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1695 - 1706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Bastian, M. J. Chacron, and L. Maler Receptive Field Organization Determines Pyramidal Cell Stimulus-Encoding Capability and Spatial Stimulus Selectivity J. Neurosci., June 1, 2002; 22(11): 4577 - 4590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
