|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
The efficiency of an asynchronous flight muscle from a beetle
1 School of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA and
2 Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
*e-mail: rkjoseph{at}uci.edu
Accepted September 17, 2001
Mechanical power output and metabolic power input were measured from an asynchronous flight muscle, the basalar muscle of the beetle Cotinus mutabilis. Mechanical power output was determined using the work loop technique and metabolic power input by monitoring CO2 production or both CO2 production and O2 consumption. At 35°C, and with conditions that maximized power output (60 Hz sinusoidal strain, optimal muscle length and strain amplitude, 60 Hz stimulation frequency), the peak mechanical power output during a 10 s burst was approximately 140 W kg–1, the respiratory coefficient 0.83 and the muscle efficiency 14–16 %. The stimulus intensity used was the minimal required to achieve a maximal isometric tetanus. Increasing or decreasing the stimulus intensity from this level changed mechanical power output but not efficiency, indicating that the efficiency measurements were not contaminated by excitation of muscles adjacent to that from which the mechanical recordings were made. The CO2 produced during an isometric tetanus was approximately half that during a bout of similar stimulation but with imposed sinusoidal strain and work output, suggesting that up to 50 % of the energy input may go to muscle activation costs. Reducing the stimulus frequency to 30 Hz from its usual value of 60 Hz reduced mechanical power output but had no significant effect on efficiency. Increasing the frequency of the sinusoidal strain from 60 to 90 Hz reduced power output but not CO2 consumption; hence, there was a decline in efficiency. The respiratory coefficient was the same for 10 s and 30 s bursts of activity, suggesting that there was no major change in the fuel used over this time range.
The mass-specific mechanical power output and the efficiency of the beetle muscle were each 2–3 times greater than values measured in previous studies, using similar techniques, from locust flight muscles, which are synchronous muscles. These results support the hypothesis that asynchronous flight muscles have evolved in several major insect taxa because they can provide greater power output and are more efficient than are synchronous muscles for operation at the high frequencies of insect flight.
Key words: muscle, asynchronous muscle, efficiency, work, work loop, metabolic rate, respiratory quotient, Cotinus mutabilis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Heymann and F.-O. Lehmann The significance of spiracle conductance and spatial arrangement for flight muscle function and aerodynamic performance in flying Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2006; 209(9): 1662 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Borrell and M. J. Medeiros Thermal stability and muscle efficiency in hovering orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini) J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(17): 2925 - 2933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Harrison and R. K. Suarez INSECT FLIGHT TAKES OFF J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(19): 3251 - 3252. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Linari, M. K. Reedy, M. C. Reedy, V. Lombardi, and G. Piazzesi Ca-Activation and Stretch-Activation in Insect Flight Muscle Biophys. J., August 1, 2004; 87(2): 1101 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Syme and R. K. Josephson How to Build Fast Muscles: Synchronous and Asynchronous Designs Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2002; 42(4): 762 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
