QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, D. V. Articles by Carrier, D. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lee, D. V. Articles by Carrier, D. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Journal of Experimental Biology 204, 3927-3934 (2001)
© 2001 The Company of Biologists Limited

Influence of increased rotational inertia on the turning performance of humans

David V. Lee, Rebecca M. Walter, Stephen M. Deban and David R. Carrier^*

Department of Biology, 201 South Biology Building, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA

*e-mail: carrier{at}biology.utah.edu

Accepted August 24, 2001

The rotational inertia of an animal can be expected to influence directly its ability to execute rapid turning maneuvers. We hypothesized that a ninefold increase in rotational inertia would reduce maximum turning performance to one-ninth of control values. To test this prediction, we increased rotational inertia about the vertical axis of six human subjects and measured their ability to turn during maximum-effort jump turns. We measured the free moment about a vertical (i.e. yaw) axis as the subjects performed maximum-effort jump turns under three conditions: (i) unencumbered, (ii) wearing a backpack with a control weight and (iii) wearing a backpack of the same mass that increased the rotational inertia of the subject to 9.2 times that with the control weight. Rotational inertia measurements allowed us to estimate the angle turned during the take-off period (i.e. from jump initiation until the feet leave the ground) and the angular power and work of the maximum-effort turns. Surprisingly, the angle turned during take-off in the increased inertia trials was 44.7 % of that of the control trials, rather than the 10.9 % (9.2-fold reduction) expected on the basis of the increase in rotational inertia. When the subjects turned with increased rotational inertia, the maximum and mean torques exerted were, on average, 142 % and 190 %, respectively, of the values recorded during the control trials. Maximum torques during increased rotational inertia trials actually approached isometric maxima. In the increased rotational inertia trials, the angular impulse was 252 % of that of the control trials and the take-off period was 130 % of that of the control trials. By exerting larger torques over longer take-off periods, the subjects were able partially to compensate for the excess rotational inertia. In contrast to the observed changes in torque, maximum and mean angular power were highest in the unencumbered trials and lowest in the increased inertia trials. On the basis of a decreased ability to generate vertical force when turning and of our estimates of angular power, we speculate that the greater than expected turning performance was due (i) to adjustments in the pattern of muscle recruitment and (ii) to a reduction in the velocity of muscle shortening that resulted in increased muscle forces.

Key words: agility, manoeuvrability, moment of inertia, locomotion, human.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Iriarte-Diaz Differential scaling of locomotor performance in small and large terrestrial mammals J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2002; 205(18): 2897 - 2908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Carrier, R. M. Walter, and D. V. Lee Influence of rotational inertia on turning performance of theropod dinosaurs: clues from humans with increased rotational inertia J. Exp. Biol., March 13, 2002; 204(22): 3917 - 3926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]