QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Siemers, B. M. Articles by Schnitzler, H.-U. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Siemers, B. M. Articles by Schnitzler, H.-U. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Journal of Experimental Biology 204, 3843-3854 (2001)
© 2001 The Company of Biologists Limited

The acoustic advantage of hunting at low heights above water: behavioural experiments on the European ‘trawling’ bats Myotis capaccinii, M. dasycneme and M. daubentonii

Björn M. Siemers^*, Peter Stilz and Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler

Department of Animal Physiology, Zoological Institute, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076 Tübingen, Germany

*e-mail: bjoern.siemers{at}uni-tuebingen.de

Accepted August 30, 2001

We have demonstrated in behavioural experiments that success in capturing prey from surfaces in ‘trawling Myotis’ (Leuconoë-type) depends on the acoustic properties of the surface on which the prey is presented. Two types of surface structure were ensonified with artificial bat signals to probe their acoustic characteristics. We have shown that perception of prey by echolocation is easier if the prey is presented on a smooth surface (such as calm water) than if it is presented on a structured surface (such as vegetation or the ground). This is because the smooth surface reflects a much lower level of clutter echoes than the structured one if ensonified at an angle typical for bats foraging low over water. The ensonification experiments revealed that the sound pressure level of the echo was even higher for mealworms on a smooth surface than for mealworms suspended in air. This might be because waves travelling via the surface also contribute to the echo (e.g. reflection from the surface to the mealworm, back to the surface and then to the receiver). From the behavioural experiments, we conclude that ‘trawling Myotis’ take isolated objects on smooth (water) surfaces for prey. Those objects reflect isolated, stationary acoustic glints back to the echolocating bats. Conversely, ‘trawling Myotis’ will not recognise prey if prey echoes are embedded in numerous clutter echoes. We have demonstrated marked similarities between the three European ‘trawling Myotis’ species M. dasycneme, M. daubentonii and M. capaccinii in echolocation behaviour, search image, foraging strategy and prey perception. We propose that a combination of prey abundance and acoustic advantages could have led to repeated and convergent evolution of ‘trawling’ bats in different parts of the world.

Key words: sensory ecology, echolocation, ensonification, prey perception, bat, Myotica paccinii, Myotica dasycneme, Myotica daubentoniis, Leuconoë, trawling, convergence.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. v. Helversen, M. W. Holderied, and O. v. Helversen Echoes of bat-pollinated bell-shaped flowers: conspicuous for nectar-feeding bats? J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2003; 206(6): 1025 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Boonman and G. Jones Intensity control during target approach in echolocating bats; stereotypical sensori-motor behaviour in Daubenton's bats, Myotis daubentonii J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2002; 205(18): 2865 - 2874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]