spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michaeli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pinshow, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michaeli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pinshow, B.
The Journal of Experimental Biology 204, 3803-3814 (2001)
© 2001 The Company of Biologists Limited

Respiratory water loss in free-flying pigeons

Gilead Michaeli and Berry Pinshow*

Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research and Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, 84990 Israel

*Author for correspondence (e-mail: pinshow{at}bgumail.bgu.ac.il)

Accepted July 31, 2001

We assessed respiratory and cutaneous water loss in trained tippler pigeons (Columba livia) both at rest and in free flight. In resting pigeons, exhaled air temperature Tex increased with ambient air temperature Ta (Tex=16.3+0.705Ta) between 15°C and 30°C, while tidal volume VT (VT=4.7±1.0 ml, mean ± S.D. at standard temperature and pressure dry) and breathing frequency fR (fR=0.46±0.06 breaths s–1) were independent of Ta. Respiratory water loss, RWL, was constant over the range of Ta (RWL=1.2±0.4 mg g–1 h–1) used. In flying pigeons, Tex increased with Ta (Tex=25.8+0.34Ta), while fR was independent of Ta (fR=5.6±1.4 breaths s–1) between 8.8°C and 27°C. Breathing frequency varied intermittently between 2 and 8 breaths s–1 during flight and was not always synchronized with wing-beat frequency. RWL was independent of air temperature (RWL=9.2±2.9 mg g–1 h–1), but decreased with increasing inspired air water vapor density ({rho}in) (RWL=12.5–0.362{rho}in), whereas cutaneous water loss, CWL, increased with air temperature (CWL=10.122+0.898Ta), but was independent of {rho}in. RWL was 25.7–32.2 %, while CWL was 67.8–74.3 % of the total evaporative water loss. The data indicate that pigeons have more efficient countercurrent heat exchange in their anterior respiratory passages when at rest than in flight, allowing them to recover more water at rest at lower air temperatures. When evaporative water loss increases in flight, especially at high Ta, the major component is cutaneous rather than respiratory, possibly brought about by reducing the skin water vapor diffusion resistance. Because of the tight restrictions imposed by gas exchange in flight, the amount of water potentially lost through respiration is limited.

Key words: Pigeon, Columbia levia, respiratory water loss, evaporative water loss, cutaneous water loss, respiratory air temperature, exhaled air temperature, breathing frequency.






© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001