spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, J. D.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 204, Issue 2 175-183, Copyright © 2001 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Acoustic detection by sound-producing fishes (Mormyridae): the role of gas-filled tympanic bladders

LB Fletcher and JD Crawford
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Mormyrid electric fish use sounds for communication and have unusual ears. Each ear has a small gas-filled tympanic bladder coupled to the sacculus. Although it has long been thought that this gas-filled structure confers acoustic pressure sensitivity, this has never been evaluated experimentally. We examined tone detection thresholds by measuring behavioral responses to sounds in normal fish and in fish with manipulations to one or to both of the tympanic bladders. We found that the tympanic bladders increase auditory sensitivity by approximately 30 dB in the middle of the animal's hearing range (200-1200 Hz). Normal fish had their best tone detection thresholds in the range 400-500 Hz, with thresholds of approximately 60 dB (re 1 microPa). When the gas was displaced from the bladders with physiological saline, the animals showed a dramatic loss of auditory sensitivity. In contrast, control animals in which only one bladder was manipulated or in which a sham operation had been performed on both sides had normal hearing.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Berenbrink
Historical reconstructions of evolving physiological complexity: O2 secretion in the eye and swimbladder of fishes
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2007; 210(9): 1641 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. C. Tricas, S. M. Kajiura, and R. K. Kosaki
Acoustic communication in territorial butterflyfish: test of the sound production hypothesis
J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2006; 209(24): 4994 - 5004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. Amoser and F. Ladich
Are hearing sensitivities of freshwater fish adapted to the ambient noise in their habitats?
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2005; 208(18): 3533 - 3542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. M. Higgs, D. T. T. Plachta, A. K. Rollo, M. Singheiser, M. C. Hastings, and A. N. Popper
Development of ultrasound detection in American shad (Alosa sapidissima)
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2004; 207(1): 155 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
A. N. Popper, D. T.T. Plachta, D. A. Mann, and D. Higgs
Response of clupeid fish to ultrasound: a review
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2004; 61(7): 1057 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Suzuki, J. Kozloski, and J. D. Crawford
Temporal Encoding for Auditory Computation: Physiology of Primary Afferent Neurons in Sound-Producing Fish
J. Neurosci., July 15, 2002; 22(14): 6290 - 6301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001