QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fletcher, L. B. Articles by Crawford, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fletcher, L. B. Articles by Crawford, J. D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 204, Issue 2 175-183, Copyright © 2001 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Acoustic detection by sound-producing fishes (Mormyridae): the role of gas-filled tympanic bladders

LB Fletcher and JD Crawford
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Mormyrid electric fish use sounds for communication and have unusual ears. Each ear has a small gas-filled tympanic bladder coupled to the sacculus. Although it has long been thought that this gas-filled structure confers acoustic pressure sensitivity, this has never been evaluated experimentally. We examined tone detection thresholds by measuring behavioral responses to sounds in normal fish and in fish with manipulations to one or to both of the tympanic bladders. We found that the tympanic bladders increase auditory sensitivity by approximately 30 dB in the middle of the animal's hearing range (200-1200 Hz). Normal fish had their best tone detection thresholds in the range 400-500 Hz, with thresholds of approximately 60 dB (re 1 microPa). When the gas was displaced from the bladders with physiological saline, the animals showed a dramatic loss of auditory sensitivity. In contrast, control animals in which only one bladder was manipulated or in which a sham operation had been performed on both sides had normal hearing.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Berenbrink Historical reconstructions of evolving physiological complexity: O2 secretion in the eye and swimbladder of fishes J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2007; 210(9): 1641 - 1652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C. Tricas, S. M. Kajiura, and R. K. Kosaki Acoustic communication in territorial butterflyfish: test of the sound production hypothesis J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2006; 209(24): 4994 - 5004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Amoser and F. Ladich Are hearing sensitivities of freshwater fish adapted to the ambient noise in their habitats? J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2005; 208(18): 3533 - 3542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Higgs, D. T. T. Plachta, A. K. Rollo, M. Singheiser, M. C. Hastings, and A. N. Popper Development of ultrasound detection in American shad (Alosa sapidissima) J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2004; 207(1): 155 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. Popper, D. T.T. Plachta, D. A. Mann, and D. Higgs Response of clupeid fish to ultrasound: a review ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2004; 61(7): 1057 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Suzuki, J. Kozloski, and J. D. Crawford Temporal Encoding for Auditory Computation: Physiology of Primary Afferent Neurons in Sound-Producing Fish J. Neurosci., July 15, 2002; 22(14): 6290 - 6301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]